Position on Cloning
According to the American Heritage Dictionary, cloning is to make multiple identical copies of a DNA sequence, to reproduce or propagate asexually. A clone is a group of genetically identical cells descended from a single common ancestor, such as a bacterial colony whose members arose from a single original cell as a result of binary fission. The process of cloning has challenged every mind in the world. Is it right to make a human being from the cells of another? In this paper I plan to discuss the ethical, moral, religious, and humorous views on cloning. I was a little confused on how a clone is made, so I will also discuss that. Are we playing "God" by believing that we have the right to manipulate nature in such a manner that we are actually bringing new lives into the world? At the conclusion of my paper I hope that you will be able to make an educated decision about your views on cloning. It all started when Ian made a lamb. Ian Wilmut removed an udder cell from a 6-year-old Finn Dorset ewe and reproduced the cell within the means of the law. He placed one of the resulting udder cells in a bath of chemicals, forcing it into suspended animation. This step ensured that the cell's deoxyribonucleic acid (DN
The chief concern was whether sheep cloning would soon lead to human cloning. That would be true if a cloned individual were treated as a lesser being, with fewer rights or lower stature. Even if cloning offers no obvious benefits to humanity, why ban it? In a democratic society we don't usually pass laws outlawing something before there is actual or probably evidence of harm. The ingredients used are alive or contain the elements of life, but it is still only God who creates life. Many scientists and ethicists, however, are warning against swiftly implementing legal restrictions without first thoroughly analyzing all aspects of cloning technology. That means each would have his or her own body, mind, and soul. (Herbert, Wray et al) Cloned and genetically modified animals could also be used as models for studying human disease. (Macklin, Ruth) So who will likely take advantage of cloning? Perhaps a grieving couple whose child is dying. This discovery is presenting the federal government with some serious and difficult policy issues. Cloning involves a person's spirit, soul and personality. " Producing extra babies just in case yours gets sick is demented. Catholic opposition comes largely from the belief that "natural moral law" prohibits most kinds of tampering with human reproduction. Would a cloned person have its own soul? Most theologians agree with scientists that a human clone and its DNA donor would be separate and distinct persons. This fear was heightened when the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center revealed just a few days later that it had cloned rhesus monkeys using nuclear transfer technology. We should not be the one's to decide how humans are produced even if it is for "scientific research.
Common topics in this essay:
Herbert Wray,
Macklin Ruth,
Austin Powers,
Protestant Jewish,
Finn Dorset,
Heritage Dictionary,
Commission NBAC,
Science Technology,
Dolly Congress,
President Clinton,
human cloning,
cloning research,
cloning technology,
wray et,
herbert wray,
wray et al,
et al,
herbert wray et,
human cloning research,
science fiction,
child organ,
austin powers,
views cloning,
scottish blackface ewe,
|
Acceptance Essays
