There must be reform
There must be reform! At the rate the United States of America is evolving at, it wouldn't be a surprise if it is on its way to becoming an oligarchy. This country is governed by the dollar, not by the president or even the people. The campaign for the presidency is becoming like a campaign for president of the student council-it is a popularity contest. The president is no longer elected due to his credentials and beliefs; his is elected by how much in can get into the public's face and make them smile. Presidential candidates say whatever will please the public and win them some votes, this is no surprise and this isn't really the bad part. The bad part is money controls the means for a candidate to even gain enough recognition and notability to arouse the publics interests. This stands true for not only presidential elections but also Senate and House campaigns. Being the year 2001 candidates now have more options available to them to make themselves known. The only problem is, all these new methods (television, radio, the Internet) cost money to use. This immediately brings up two problems. The first being that the candidate with the most funds has a great advantage to winning just based on their ability to gain
It would be unfair to take a Republican citizen's money and hand it over to the Democratic Party, but if the money taken was equally distributed this would cease to be a problem. If an election is to be won it should be won with minimal amount of mud slinging. Besides obstacles in Congress (which most can be easily remedied by loopholes) the other great problem facing public financing is public cynicism powered by soft money. The republicans voted against McCain's proposal due to some soft money that the Republican Party received from large tobacco companies. Many people are not involved in politics because it scares them. The use of tobacco is growing (especially with teens) and is without a doubt detrimental to the health of anyone who uses it. So what would be the most beneficial campaign finance reform for both the candidates and the people? That is a very difficult question to answer due to personal opinion and differing partisan values. People have long endorsed public financing of congressional campaigns and their support is unwavering. The most productive way to figure out what is best for the country is to think solely for the benefit of the people. This will allow an equal amount of televised competition and if it is free perhaps the candidates will use their time wisely and promote themselves, not denigrate their opponent. Everyone is entitled to freedom of speech, this is true, but people should have the dignity to use this right in a proper manner. The most important thing is to please the people. " If these reforms were to take place the most important result would be that it would appease the masses. Unfortunately, the current Congress will not pass public funding, and the people cannot wait for it to do so. There are five specific areas that could greatly use some reforming in our electoral process.
Common topics in this essay:
Democratic Party,
President Reagan,
Republican Party,
Zapple Rule,
Senate House,
United America,
Supreme Court,
John McCain's,
soft money,
public financing,
hard money,
Mitch McConnell,
hard money soft,
campaign finance,
rule provides,
money soft,
Senatorial Committee,
rule provides free,
people involved,
phony ads,
minimal amount,
free reply,
people apprehensive vote,
money hard money,
money soft money,
|