Animal Experimentation: Where do we draw the line?
If your pet dog Sparky became suddenly ill, would you begin to perform experiments on your uncle Waldo to try to find a cure? Probably not, that would be ridiculous. Finding a cure for a nonhuman disease in a human is completely illogical. Yet people across the world have been led to believe that experimenting on animals to find cures for human diseases, medical progress can be made. Not only is this ridiculous, but it is totally illogical. Over 25 million animals are used in experiments yearly just in the Untied States. These animals suffer and usually die in laboratories testing cosmetics, for education, and for biomedical experimentation.A pamphlet published by the Department of Health and Human Services states "For some research it's simply not ethical to experiment on humans..." If these experiments are so unethical that they cannot be performed on humans, why is it that it is ethical to perform them on animals? Most scientists justify their animal experiments by saying that the animals don't know what is being done to them, that they lack the intelligence and emotion of humans. However, psychologists frequently perform psychological experiments on animals so
During surgical training, medical students properly begin to learn procedures by observing human operations because of the human's unique anatomical features. Despite the fact that scientists have to induce or create disease in other animals indicates that animal models aren't appropriate in studying human disease or other ailments, supporters of vivisection (tests, experiments, and 'educational' exercises involving harm to live animals) claim that it has played a crucial role in virtually all medical advances. Patient Studies have always been the main source of medical knowledge. For example, population studies show that second hand smoke doubles the risk of developing lung cancer. Some schools require students to dissect cats, dogs, frogs, fetal pigs, and other animals. Drugs were used to dilate their pupils and to hold their eyes open, and the response of a part of their brains to moving patterns was recorded. At Nottingham University, five cats were used to research changes in vision sensitivity when the eye moves. Animal models have not contributed to AIDS research, despite being used extensively. After these experiments take place, the surviving animals are killed. Young scientists quickly learn to adopt this mindset from their tutors. Animal laboratories aren't necessary for teaching biological and medical material, and studies have repeatedly demonstrated their lack of educational superiority. Rabbits are used in this test because their eyes produce no tears so the substance cannot be washed away. The cats were given anesthetics and arteries in their necks were tied. This error caused doctors to misdirect patients on preventive measures and delayed the tissue culture samples critical to the discovery of a vaccine.
Common topics in this essay:
Ebola American,
Nottingham University,
Human Services,
Clarence Little,
Arnold Arluke,
Newcastle University,
ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION,
Autopsies Biopsies,
Epidemiology Artificial,
Henry Heimlich,
animal experimentation,
lung cancer,
animal experiments,
animal models,
live animals,
people world,
population studies,
nerve messages,
medical centers,
leg muscles,
|
Acceptance Essays
