RU-486
RU-486 is the recently approved abortion pill. It affords women an opportunity to have a non-surgical abortion within the first seven weeks of pregnancy. The guidelines require for the woman to have multiple doctor visits, as well as counseling - so this is a bit different then the morning after pill. Controversy surrounds RU-486 on many levels. Firstly, there are the possible side effects as well as the slight failure rate (from which a woman would still need to have a surgical abortion). Also, the availability, and the attempts to control it, is another issue. Finally, the political sparks created, as well as the Republican effort to limit the pill is another issue. On the whole, since RU-486 was approved in late September, the number of debates surrounding it has multiplied. Of course, the major issue is not whether a woman can or cannot have an abortion, but whether non-surgical abortion is a viable option for a woman. One side of the coin feels that a woman should under no circumstances have an abortion. During the days of surgical abortions, this could be a more valid argument, given the extensiveness of the surgery - as well as the under minded ways of having a surgical abortion (i.e. the horrible coat hanger stories). T
A prescribing physician also must have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital . However, those that oppose abortion on the whole have taken RU-486 as its flagship to limit all types of abortion and various factors associated with abortions. There is one current argument that underlies both sides of the coin, which is necessary to present when discussing this. Politicians are not making it easy for a woman to feel comfortable making these decisions, which is far from fair given it is 2001. Legislation proposed on February 6, 2001 "requires that a physician prescribing RU-486 must be qualified to handle complications from incomplete abortions as well as legally authorized to perform abortions. " Having an option alternate to that of surgery is a safety towards women. So women who have discussed options with their doctors and have decided to take RU-486 may not be able to get it, depending on their pharmacist's personal beliefs. " Having politics involved in an already approved FDA drug is very detrimental to a woman's concern for herself and her ability to raise a child. There is currently legislation in the ranks in Ohio that will allow pharmacists to refuse to fill a prescription if they are morally against it . Initially, George Bush banned FDA testing of the drug. So the argument has expanded from a woman's choice to the opinions of her politicians and now pharmacists as well. his standpoint extends into the age of the fetus, and which trimesters should a woman is able to abort in. This is allowing pharmacists to decide whether or not a person can have any medication that the pharmacist is personally opposed to the treatment. The benefits of having a non-surgical abortion outweigh the risks associated with a surgical abortion. " By limiting the doctors able to prescribe the pill, Republicans are circumventing the availability of the pill to women.
Common topics in this essay:
,
George Bush,
Roe Wade,
RU-486 RU-486,
RU-486 Lawmakers,
Bill Clinton,
Washington DC,
John Ashcroft,
surgical abortion,
woman abortion,
morning pill,
non-surgical abortion,
issue woman abortion,
issue woman,
fda approval,
ru-486 safe,
writing legislation,
saying woman,
nearly nine ten,
nine ten women,
woman feel,
|
Acceptance Essays
