The Trial of Mumia Abu-Jamal
In class, we recently watch a movie on convicted cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal. While the movie was informative, I couldn't help but being a little troubled by it. I began wondering why this man was so dangerous and yet so many people were standing up for him. In order to gain a better understanding of the situation, I visited www.danielfaulkner.com in order to get the other side of the story. I knew I would find some discrepancies between the sides telling their views. I thought these differences would be minimal at best but I was shocked to find out how dissimilar the two viewpoints were. The movie we saw in class was very pro-Mumia. In it, various people talked about the trial, from the witnesses to the attorneys to Mumia Abu-Jamal himself. Throughout the movie, the narrator continually bashed the facts given by the police and the prosecuting attorney Joseph McGill. Whenever they stated a point, the next statement from the narrator was either negative or attempted to prove their statement wrong. However, when the defense attorney Anthony Jackson or any witnesses stated a point beneficial to Mumia, the narrator quickly agreed with their point. Also, these witnesses in the movie were all in support of Mumia Abu-Jamal eve
The movie claimed that Sabo unfairly sentenced Jamal to death due to his record as the judge with the most death sentences. However, most of the "facts" brought up in the movie were entirely false. There are two things wrong with this statement. Also, the judge isn't the one who sentences criminals. 44 pistol is usually a magnum or a semi-automatic weapon. To me, these witnesses are attempting to protect Jamal. By reading the transcript of the trial, I discovered how biased the movie was. After watching the movie and visiting the web site, I have come to the conclusion that Mumia Abu-Jamal is guilty of killing Officer Daniel Faulkner. 38 pistol, which was the caliber of the gun in Jamal's possession. n though some have changed their stories on a number of occasions. He supported neither the prosecution nor defense. The last point I want to make is the evidence provided by the witnesses. The movie, to me, gave only one side of the story and heavily favored Mumia Abu-Jamal. It was difficult to tell from the movie whether Jamal was innocent or guilty due to the witnesses changing their stories constantly. However, the narrator was biased towards one side and therefore, got a plethora of opinions instead of the facts surrounding this situation.
Common topics in this essay:
Mumia Abu-Jamal,
Jones Jones,
Albert Sabo,
Jamal Sabo,
Cynthia White,
Jackson Throughout,
Anthony Jackson,
Dessie Hightower,
McGill Whenever,
Abu-Jamal Throughout,
mumia abu-jamal,
44 pistol,
biased jamal,
sabo biased jamal,
sabo biased,
watching movie visiting,
throughout movie,
transcript trial,
ballistics expert,
watching movie,
movie visiting,
throughout movie narrator,
movie informative,
|
Acceptance Essays
