Is today's news what it should be?
Is today's news a truthful account of the day's events? Is it a blatant attempt to guide the reader's reaction to keep interests high? Or do entertainment corporations trying to make a profit overrun today's news? Should there be certain standards of journalism in news today? To answer these questions, the reader must understand the definition of news. Jack Fuller best defines news as "a report of what a news organization has recently learned about matters of some significance or interest to the specific community that news organization serves." Journalism in today's news is not the same as it was over half a century ago. The reader can see this in Jim Squires' statement that journalism "even at its worst and most unfair... once had as its goal a quest for accuracy and perspective that would eventually provide truth." Whereas news, itself, is best defined best defined by the Hutchinson Commission on freedom of the pres in 1947 as a "truthful, comprehensive, and intelligent account of the day's events in a context which gives them meaning." So what has happened to journalism today? Journalism no longer seeks accuracy and fairness. There are many fallacies in the basis of today's journalism. Journalism today has the tendency to
The Golden Rule leads to another example of how news needs to be. The reader might make a rash opinion because of the lack of background information. One final example of the shortcomings in today's news is the intervention of "Big Business". If the writer has a traditionally racist background, he/she probably agrees with the police action taken against Mr. The audience should not be persuaded to have one view or another based on the lack of background information given, the bias in a writer's own opinion, or in the interests of big business. This bias causes the writer to record more negative events, such as someone's tragic death, as opposed to something more positive, like a marriage or birth of a child. declared war, or what events might have led up to this. Very little background information is recorded, which in turn does not inform the reader enough to make an educated opinion. Journalism concentrates more on the negatives than the positives. These guidelines will help journalism return to its accurate and fair form of the past. Journalism is also biased towards the writer's own opinion. This is a key example of how "Big Business" capitalizes off the influencing of reader's opinions. Jack Fuller shows how news might be inaccurate and unfair in his example of a report over a public debate.
Common topics in this essay:
Houston Texas,
Hutchinson Commission,
Jack Fuller,
Night Raw,
Golden Rule,
,
Rodney King,
Jim Squires',
Jim Squires,
York Times,
background information,
night raw,
accuracy fairness,
own opinion,
day's events,
account day's events,
lack background,
writer's own,
jack fuller,
golden rule,
account day's,
lack background information,
writer's own opinion,
intelligent account day's,
comprehensive intelligent account,
|
Acceptance Essays
