Abolition of the British Monarchy
My chosen topic is the issue of whether the British monarchy should be abolished. I believe that it should and I have four main reasons to support my views and I believe that I can persuade royalists that the idea of a monarchy should be abandoned. The four reasons are firstly the effect the British monarchy has on the idea of a democracy, the effects they have on society, the political powers they behold and the money spent both on and by them.The royal family is under fire from many quarters over their marital mishaps and financial indiscretions. But the problems with the royals go far deeper than that. I see the existence of the monarchy as a symbol of much that is wrong with British society and its political system today. Increasing democracy is by far the most important and powerful reason to ditch the monarchy.The word democracy is ultimately derived from a term comprised of 'demos - the people' and 'kratos - strength and power'. So basically democracy means the power lies in the hands of the people. In most developed countries, this entails the direct election of a Parliament and an elected head of state. Unfortunately, Britain has lagged behind other developed countries in both these areas. Our head of state an
Firstly, because certain element of the Queen expenditure would continue with an elected President and secondly because the money spent on the Windsors is a tiny fraction of the government overall budget anyway. Rule by inheritance in general makes no sense and cannot be justified nowadays. I would argue, therefore, that the creation of a republic would significantly diminish the reinforcement of conservative values also causing an important social change. In today's global news network, the example of Britain finally shedding its feudal past may give strength to pro-democracy movements abroad. Not enviable qualities in the twenty-first century. Potentially, even MPs elected to form a republic would have to swear an oath to serve Her Majesty in order to take their seats in parliament. A few examples of potential cost cuts and improved income under a republic are, firstly, decreased security costs as a president would only fulfil one role rather that the dozens by the royal family. Now, Now, this may not be something that particularly concerns you but I would much rather be regarded as an outright citizen that is the equal of all other British citizens. This shows that most of the countries showing support for monarchy are desperate and are in need of political and social structure. To have the title of Head of State passed through heredity is just ridiculous. The time saved by disposing of such unnecessary events like the State Opening of Parliament could be better spent by the government and other institutions debating more important issues on the political agenda. For me, finance isn't the major issue in the case against the monarchy that some people claim it to be. To this I can say that theses the majority of these countries are in Eastern Europe and have gone through most of the last century as corrupt dictatorships. The Queen has the ability to dissolve parliament and choose the person that heads Her Majesty's Government, that is the Prime Minister following a general election.
Common topics in this essay:
Italy France,
Increased Openness,
,
House Lords,
Privy Purse,
Potentially MPs,
Gulf War,
Nationality Act,
Eastern Europe,
Regulations Act,
royal family,
british society,
royal prerogative,
swear oath serve,
britain republic,
society political,
century tradition,
twenty-first century,
forces swear,
armed forces,
armed forces swear,
political agenda,
|
Acceptance Essays
