Stop Stealing Songs
Have you dreamed that you could get your favorite artistfs songs such as Eric Clapton, Rolling Stones, and Beatles without any payment? The dream has come true: Napster, an online music sharing soft. It enables its users to download music files through the Internet, which means that as long as one music lover has a computer and connection to the Internet, the music lover can get popular songs, classical music, and even national anthems. One CD costs about fifteen dollars, but Napster does not require its users to pay because the users are just borrowing and lending their music files with each other. This is just like a dream. I do not even know how much money I have spent to listen to my favorite musicians. The dream, Napster, has attracted over eighty millions of music fans all over the world since it was made in 1999, according to USA Today. Unfortunately it has also caught music companiesf attention and Napster was sued. The battle between the music companies and Napster, which pretends to be a messiah for music fans who complain about CD prices or just want songs free, were likely to be the lose of Napster and, in fact, it was. The Supreme Court ordered Napster to limit its service and the limitation of the service has
The second problem that Napster has is that it does not pay musicians. Napster should completely stop its service because it is, in reality, violating the copyrights, users are not paying artists, and it can spoil the future of online music and movies distribution. The final reason that Napster should stop its service is that they can destroy the future of the online distribution of music and movies. The users of Napster and Napster itself do not care about it. That is the responsibility of music fans. The scale of Napster is too large to justify the excuse. Even though there are some ways to allow Napster be alive such as controlling the amount of songs downloaded, it will not work because gThat kind of centralized control is anathema to Napster users, who have flocked there largely because of the vast and growing array of music available for copying. These calculations have no concrete information and the amount may be lower or even higher, but the important thing is that, at least, the damage for the music companies and artists is not little, but huge. Is it possible for a person to know over eighty millions of users to justify the use of Napster, saying gThis is just a personal tradingh? If it is possible, they may not be stealing songs and their excuse does work, but in fact it is not. h(Mercury News) One good thing Napster has brought is that it has awakened the music companies and musicians to the importance of security accompanied by the online music distribution.
Common topics in this essay:
Internet Napster,
Court Napster,
Napster Napster,
Stones Beatles,
USA Unfortunately,
Standard Feb,
music files,
millions users,
Mercury July,
,
music movies,
eighty millions,
music companies,
eighty millions users,
Report June,
online music,
Times Sept,
violating copyrights,
future online,
music fans,
cd prices,
online music movies,
trading songs eighty,
music movies distribution,
cd prices expensive,
|
Acceptance Essays
