Shutting Down Napster is Not The Solution
Shutting Down Napster is Not the Solution Almost everyone has heard of Napster and its long debated issue's of file swapping and sharing. Considering Napster's short-lived existence of about a year and a half, they have certainly opened many people's eyes. Some say the file swapping that Napster allows everyone to do is illegal; others says it's just another thing to do on the internet. Napster has done much good for the internet, adding one more good thing that the internet can do for us. Napster has raised several intense controversial issues in the music industry of copyright infringement laws. Although shutting down Napster is not the solution; some agreement between the plaintiffs and Napster should come about. Napster is a medium for trading and/or swapping of music files over the internet. Napster has about 20 million users worldwide (Grimaldi Online). This phenomenon called Napster has taking the entire internet by storm. Just think all Napster is, is a program designed by a nineteen-year-old kid, a college dropout. Who would have thought that it would cause so much excitement in the music industry (Online)? Napster has allowed millions of people to be able to share their music over the internet. In these
They claim that using Napster as an exchanging medium for music is exercising one First Amendment rights as a United States citizen. Many different people are suing Napster, but Metallica is the only band suing, there are several people trying to get Napster shutdown, because it is taking away from their business and profits. One of the people suing Napster claimed that if the Napster would let Bertelsmann buy into a piece of Napster, it would drop its lawsuit against Napster. Shutting down Napster is not the answer to the problem; there will be several other companies just like it to find away around infringement lawsuits. In Napster's defense, they claim that they are not committing any illegal acts, just by letting its member's share files at their own will. " Napster Ordered to Shut Down Service Aids Piracy of Music, Judge Says. I also agree with musicians; they should be reward for their intellectual property, their music. millions of people trading and swapping music, there have been claims of illegal acts being committed by the Napster users. " Washington Post, The (DC) (29 July 2000). Napster is not making any money from these trades of music. The fee would be minimal, like $5 a month; this would make many record companies happy. "Napster Wins Reprieve from Court-Ordered Shutdown. Lars Ulrich, drummer for Metallic, brought on this lawsuit; Lars was very upset to find out the people were trading their music with out them, Metallica, getting paid.
Common topics in this essay:
Lars Ulrich,
Napster Bertelsmann,
Considering Napster's,
Grimaldi Online,
Online Napster,
BMG Music,
Shutting Napster,
Hall Patel,
Napster Metallica,
Napster Napster,
copyright infringement,
nov 2000,
napster shutdown,
13 nov,
2000 online,
internet napster,
13 nov 2000,
shutting napster,
music industry,
people suing napster,
swapping music,
post dc,
shutting napster solution,
washington post dc,
court copyright infringement,
|
Acceptance Essays
