Civil Rights
The Constitution Protects the Civil Rights of Americans The Constitution does protect the civil rights of Americans. Even though some laws are passed that violate the civil rights of people in the United States, the Supreme Court corrects these errors. The cases reviewed here ask if it is okay to compose and mandate prayer in schools, whether the death penalty is Constitutional, and how much privacy is given to the American people. In the following Supreme Court cases, the reader will find that the decisions made are Constitutional and ensure that the civil rights of Americans are protected. The First Amendment to the Constitution forbids the government form supporting religion. In the Supreme Court case, Engle v.. Vitale, a New York school system composed a prayer and forced children to pray in the mornings at school. This action by the school system clearly violates the "no establishment" clause of the First Amendment, which states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." The Supreme Court ruled six to one that it was unconstitutional for schools to compose and mandate prayer.
The Griswold decision was a good decision. In Connecticut, there was a law that forbid the use and distribution of information about contraceptives. It can be inferred that the writers of the Bill of Rights meant for privacy to be included in this amendment. This law was overruled by the Supreme Court in the case, Griswold v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty was not unconstitutional as long as it was not arbitrarily applied. Because the Supreme Court abolished the Connecticut law forbidding the use and distribution of information about contraceptives, the people of the United States can rest assured that their right to privacy is being protected. The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits "cruel and unusual punishment. This type of action can be interpreted as a state not respecting a person's right to privacy, which is not only unconstitutional, but wrong. Since the use and distribution of information about contraceptives does not fall under any of these categories, it is not Constitutionally correct for the government to violate people's privacy in the way that it did in the Connecticut law. This case was accurately read because the writers of the Bill of Rights did not believe that the death penalty constituted "cruel and unusual punishment. In the preceding Supreme Court cases, the Justices that heard the cases upheld the meanings of the Amendments contained in the Bill of Rights. The government only has the right to censor information if it endangers national security or if it is considered obscene.
Common topics in this essay:
Supreme Court,
Bill Rights,
Griswold Connecticut,
Amendment Constitution,
Vitale York,
Americans Constitution,
Rights Due,
supreme court,
Court Justices,
Amendment Congress,
death penalty,
bill rights,
cruel unusual,
unusual punishment,
civil rights,
cruel unusual punishment,
rights americans,
Word Count,
distribution information contraceptives,
distribution information,
writers bill,
decision decision,
civil rights americans,
writers bill rights,
compose mandate prayer,
|
Acceptance Essays
