Panofskys views on Van Eyck
Panofsky's purpose in writing this article was to identify a painting discovered in Brussels in 1815 (referred to as the "London portrait") as the portrait of Geovanni Arnolfimi and his wife Jeanne de Cename, painted in 1434. Panofsky uses historical documentation and iconography to prove his point. Because a painting's value can be enhanced by its historical significance, it is important to discover its background. Identifying a painting from several centuries ago is not easy. Because there is no photocopy available, we must depend on physical descriptions provided by others for recognition. Only paintings possessed by rich or historically significant people would be described in inventories or letters saved over hundreds of years. Wars often brought destruction and chaos, destroying historical documentation.Panofsky traces the "provenance" of this picture to provide a logical argument that the "London portrait" could be the Arnolfimi painting. He carefully documents the historical journey of the Arnolfimi painting, providing a continuous list of ownership from Don Diego de Guevara of Spain in the 1500's to Charles III in 1789. This careful documentation is to prove that the Amolfimi painting was still listed as being in Madr
The timing of its disappearance and the subsequent discovery of the "London portrait" in Brussels in 1815 could easily be attributed to the chaos caused by Napoleon's conquering of Spain during the lost time period. Iconology, the study of iconography, can provide us with a better understanding of an art object by providing its historical context. Because the Art History discipline addresses a wide variety of objects from all over the world, and from all known times, misinterpretations caused by language translation can be a critical problem. An icon is an image whose association with a particular meaning is wide accepted. Establishing a source as reliable and supported by other evidence is very important for an art historian. The Council of Trent added the stulation that 2 witnesses and a priest were also required. His use of such materials as brass, velvet, wood and fur not only make the background more realistic, but also are used as symbols to reinforce the painting's theme. In Panofsky's era, most research scholars were fluent in German, French, and Latin. Some symbols have been designed to represent a particular ritual or object. This symbol can convey emotions associated with its meaning, to have symbolized a particular meaning. He often made his library available to scholars and his house a literary and artistic center. Panofsky uses the anecdote about Willibald Pirckheimer's mother to support his argument an undocumented wedding could lead to misunderstanding and problems. Today fluency in English is also essential.
Common topics in this essay:
Van Eyck,
Art History,
Geovanni Arnolfimi,
Charles III,
David Michal,
Van Eyck's,
Panofsky Vermander,
Nuremberg German,
Council Trent,
Willibald Pirckheimer's,
van eyck,
london portrait,
people standing,
joining hands,
people standing side,
van eyck's,
standing side,
arnolfimi painting,
art history,
foreign quotes,
written accounts,
willibald pirckheimer's mother,
|
Acceptance Essays
