Abandon the Use of Cellular Phones
In this new age of technology, it is incredibly common to see someone with a cellular phone in their hand whether walking across a street, driving in an automobile or buying a brand new one at a local wireless phone company. Seemingly, there are now well over 140 million cellular phone users around the world (Sundeen, 2003). The handheld device is convenient for those who need to call ahead if they are running late for an appointment, to make an emergency phone call or to have a simple conversation. Despite the convenience factor of wireless phones, there are intriguing ramifications such as aircraft malfunctioning, automobile accidents and health issues that should lead to the diminishing of cellular phones. Warned by many airline companies, one of the problems caused by cellular phones is the interference with the aircraft's communication and navigation systems. It was not until the year 2000 when all airline companies ban the use of cellular phones. The law restriction was forced primarily because of an air crash of the flight number LX 498 Crossair (Saab 340), a private aircraft, which killed 10 people on board. The speculation was that it was caused by an SMS message received by a passenger and a cellular phone call. Data
However, in a 1996 study completed by the U. An alternative solution is to have politicians around the world to indulge in an idea of putting payphones around every block of the city. Terrell has the answer for that question; his response is that "safety is still at stake in the debate over cell phone regulations. While motorists believe that a cellular phone gives a sense of safety for their well-being, the handheld devices can be deemed a lethal accessory. Not surprisingly, in 2003, according to The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 20 to 30 percent of motor vehicle accidents are caused by distractions of cellular phone use (Ropeik & Gray, 2003). Drivers are aware about the possible dangers that they can run into but still decide to use the handheld device anyway. Furthermore, plane developers Boeing Co. and Airbus Industries have done a simulation where cellular phone frequencies were transmitted to their aircrafts and discovered no interference with any of the systems (Murtazin & Sennikova, 2002). The first ever case of cellular phones potentially being harmful happened in 1993, when a male resident of Florida filed a lawsuit claiming that his wife's brain tumor was caused by the constant use of a cellular phone (). By banning the use of cellular phones on board of aircrafts, the uncertainty of cellular phones being an issue won't pose much of a problem if something did occur like the events of flight number LX 498 Crossair (Saab 340). The handheld device has its advantages, but looking at the outcomes of certain situations, there should be no place for this technology to be situated in our modern day. There is growing evidence that supports the potential danger of cellular phones.
Common topics in this essay:
Ropeik Gray,
Association CTIA,
,
Crossair Saab,
George Carlo,
Timothy Terrell,
Murtazin Sennikova,
cellular phones,
Research Council,
Research WTR,
Aviation Administration,
cellular phone,
gray 2003,
ropeik gray 2003,
ropeik gray,
phone users,
effects cellular,
cellular phone users,
robins 2000,
handheld device,
498 crossair saab,
board aircrafts,
crossair saab 340,
running late,
flight lx 498,
|
Acceptance Essays
