James Pollard
In Alan DershowitzÕs novel Chutzpah, he devotes an entire section to the issue of, and his personal feelings about James Pollard. He begins this section with a description of the way in which this man was caught selling classified government documents to the nation of Israel. Basically this man was a Jewish American spy for the Israeli government because of a duty he felt stemming from a secret loyalty he felt toward the nation of Israel. Over an extended period of time this man sold thousand of secret documents which in the eyes of Weinberger, the Secretary of Defense for the United States was a Òserious breech in national security.Ó Dershowitz emphasizes in great detail how in order to avoid a trial in which the declassification of these documents would be required, Pollard was pressured to accept a plea bargain in which he would plead guilty, give full disclosure pertaining to the information he handed over, and release all rights to any of his future published material that p
He states: I am convinced that if Pollard were a non-Jew who had spied for a non-Jewish country, he would not be in prison today. However, Dershowitz has pledged to fight on his behalf until he is released. This is a very serious crime, and in my opinion should not be diluted with charges of anti Semitism. It has been suggested that if Pollard were released he could move to Israel at which time he would receive a heroÕs welcome and a new life of wealth and prestige. Dershowitz blames poor legal advice and failure for the government to hold up its end of the deal for PollardÕs present situation. This is something that a majority of Americans would find disheartening at best. Dershowitz stated in no uncertain terms that in his opinion the reason for for this discrepancy in the sentencing process has to do with the fact that Pollard is a Jewish man who betrayed America for Israel. Dershowitz makes a convincing argument that Pollard received a sentence that was inconsistent both with past cases as well as what he was actually promised in return for his guilty plea. He reiterates over and over that PollardÕs actions were not in conflict with American national security and that Israel was some how entitled to the documents because in many ways they pertained to Israeli national security. Ó Dershowitz finds fault in the way PollardÕs lawyers handled the case. The evidence that Dershowitz presents suggests that Pollard did get an unfair deal, and a much harsher sentence than others in the past have received for similar crimes. Pollard agreed to this deal and was satisfied with it until he received a sentence of life in a maximum security prison and his wife received 5 years in prison. It is not exactly clear to the general public exactly what information Pollard turned over to the Israelis. All of these documents are still classified and it is likely that they will be for many years to come. Dershowitz does his best to downplay PollardÕs acts of treason and at the same hammers home his point that Pollard is being unfairly held.
Common topics in this essay:
America Israel,
Defense United,
Semitism Pollard,
Semitism Dershowitz,
Israel American,
Pollard Israelis,
Jewish American,
James Pollard,
Alan DershowitzÕs,
plea bargain,
Pollard Jewish,
accept plea,
national security,
pollard received,
anti semitism,
nation israel,
accept plea bargain,
received sentence,
dershowitzÕs eyes,
|
Acceptance Essays
