Affirmative Action
A major controversy encompassing the country is the issue of affirmative action. Many believe that the abolition, or at least restructure, of affirmative action in the United States will benefit the nation for many logical reasons. Originally, affirmative action began as an attempt to eliminate discrimination and provide a source of opportunity; affirmative action did not begin as an attempt to support just minorities and women. In addition, affirmative action naturally creates resentment when the less qualified are preferred instead of the people actually deserve the admission or job. Another reason that has existed since the abolition of slavery is the myth that women and ?minorities? cannot compete against white males without receiving special preference or treatment. Money used for the support and continuance of affirmative action cost in excess of 125 million dollars annually. Important programs in the country may benefit from the money received by affirmative action bureaucrats. Most importantly, the fundamentals of democracy rest on the equality of all people, whereas affirmative action is actually trying to give minorities and women higher status of importance than Caucasians. If the policies of a
This means that they provide ?equal opportunity for minorities. The country should go back to the passing of the United States Civil Rights act: ?The state shall not discriminated against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group, on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. Affirmative action is actually dividing the country into two different racial categories: all minorities against the majority. The other three are an Asian female, black male, and white female. The government could better spend this money on programs such as: food for the poor, help for earthquake victims, and improvement of state and local parks and amusements. Every government and educational system should dispose of affirmative action and let people succeed on a fair, color-blind, race-blind, and gender-blind basis. The company now is no longer looking for good experienced employees; instead, they are trying to appear fair. The idea of affirmative action comes across as meaning that all Caucasians are rich and do not need financial aid, minorities are all poor, and every minority person needs financial aid. This causes severe resentment towards those minorities who are less qualified yet are preferred because they feel sympathy or pity towards them. Two of these minority applicants have no practical experience and the other only a few years. This is not true for the minorities in general. One applicant is a white male age 35 who has six years of on the job experience. When trying to apply and qualify for scholarships an applicant will find that the majority of the scholarships are for minority or specific race only descendants. The minorities insist that the government should offer all of the government aid money towards minorities and women instead of everyone.
Common topics in this essay:
Rights Act,
Affirmative Action,
Civil Rights,
affirmative action,
equal opportunity,
minorities women,
civil rights,
civil rights act,
women minorities,
rights act,
minorities compete,
towards minorities,
special preference treatment,
affirmative action actually,
women minorities compete,
millions dollars,
complete opposite,
myth women minorities,
|
Acceptance Essays
