Ethics of Animal testing
This theme song to a popular cartoon is a farce dealing with experiments carried out on animals. In the cartoon one mouse is made very smart and wants to take over the world while the other is clearly not as smart. While the cartoon makes jokes, the reality is that mice and other animals re being used for medical tests every day. For some people this testing brings up ethical questions. One of the biggest questions: is it really necessary to take the lives of animals in the name of science and for the betterment of humanity? For animal rights activists, like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the answer is no. PETA pressures labs into halting experiments because they believe that animals are not to be used by humans for "food, clothing, entertainment, or to experiment on" (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals 1). Its stance is that any testing is painful, inhumane, and unnecessary when alternatives are available. The PETA website says that "animals, like humans, have interests that cannot be sacrificed or traded away simply because it might benefit others." (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals 2-3). Essentially, PETA is of the opinion that animals and humans should have identical righ
That fact can best be described by the following quote: "Animal rights activists blocked for two years research aimed at stopping transmission of HIV from mother to child. In 1991 it was discovered that Procter and Gamble had performed experiments on 300 guinea pigs when the data the tests was to obtain was already available ("Animal Testing by the Cosmetic Industry" 2). PETA's stance is that animal life is too valuable to risk on experimentation especially when there are alternatives, such as false human skin grown in culture, computer programs, and using human subjects. Taking a few skin cells and growing them into small squares of skin produces the false human skin. These similarities are what scientists need for experiments to be accurate. "Animal Research Saves Human and Animal Lives. If there is no clear criteria then it is "assumed that procedures that cause pain in humans also cause pain in animals (United States Department of Agriculture 50). "Veganism as the Path to Animal Liberation. While animal rights groups such as PETA advocate abolishing all animal testing that inflicts pain on animals, proponents of testing cite laws and regulations which minimize pain and discomfort. Bibliography Works Cited "Animal Testing by the Cosmetic Industry.
Common topics in this essay:
Department Agriculture,
Medical Progress,
Botting Morrison,
PETA HSUS,
Essentially PETA,
,
Progress Sometimes,
Treatment Animals,
Cosmetic Industry,
United HSUS,
animal testing,
department agriculture,
united department,
americans medical,
medical progress,
americans medical progress,
united department agriculture,
animal research,
ethical treatment animals,
animal rights,
people ethical,
people ethical treatment,
20 march,
treatment animals,
20 march 1999,
|
Acceptance Essays
