Self-responsibility and interest can be examined in different perspectives. By nature, a person usually expects to reach his goal without considering the possibility of his or her decision and how it may affect the community around them. It is often times very difficult to differentiate responsibility from self-interest due to the fact that the consequences of being responsible conflict with the achievements of personal goals.
             According to the A Brush with AIDS case study, the character faces the problem of making a decision, based on her self-interest and social responsibility. The consequence of choosing creates many risks, not only for her career, but for her reputation as well. If a decision gives benefits to a single person, and not to a whole society, the decision can be judged as being a responsible one. The risk is derived from making a responsible decision without considering the benefits to one's self.
             The character's career becomes very successful when she is promoted from a sales representative to a senior market manager. She begins to earn a bigger income and more responsibility from her company, Sharp's. The company is doing very well since the sale of its' health products went from $9.6 million to $135 million in annual sales. The character does not foresee any future problems with her career.
             But soon, problems start to arise. It comes to light that some of Sharp's containers broke in cold temperature, causing product failures that put housecleaning personnel and nurses in great risk. The risk of being infected with deadly disease, such as AIDS, rises for hospital employees, because of the poor quality of Sharp's products.
             The character recognizes the product's failure, but still must fight with herself to whether or not replacing the old Sharp's products will benefit her future career and whether or not it is worth it. If the product is replaced, it will require additional costs, as well as delays with the ...