Comparison of Agricola and Charlemagne
In Agricola, Tacitus recounts the contrast between barbarian peoples living in such backward area such as Britain and the civilized Romans in the heart of the empire through the life of Agricola. Agricola is depicted with all the standard attributes of the prudent and successful general. Tacitus reveals that “in spite of all, Agricola decided to go and meet peril” (Tacitus 69). Thus this depicts Agricola as warrior-like as well as a successful general. Also, the Roman noble was born to a tradition of service to the state as seen through Agricola. Moreover, Tacitus idealizes Agricola’s most prominent characteristic of moderation, which is, self . . .
Similar to Agricola, Charlemagne was very devoted to education and he never stopped studying himself. Like Agricola, Charlemagne was depicted as being successful in wars, as “Charlemagne pressed on energetically…refusing to withdraw from a campaign already started…brought to complete fruition what he was striving to achieve” (Charlemagne 59). Moreover, Agricola would instill education among the “barbaric” people of Britain as Agricola “educated the sons of the chiefs in the liberal arts…speak Latin language effectively…and spoke of ‘civilization’” (Tacitus 73). As one can see from the excerpt, Charlemagne orders that “the great collection of books which he has made in his library shall be bought at a reasonable price by anybody who wants to have them” (Charlemagne 89). As a result, Agricola is a man whose achievements far excel those of other men who pursue courses of willful independence and die ostentatious death. Importantly to Charlemagne, unlike that of Agricola, Charlemagne had a deep devotion to the church as he “commanded the bishops and churchmen to restore sacred edifices” (Charlemagne 71). Thus Agricola is shown as a sensible man with much achievements in Britain. Furthermore, Charlemagne was determined to make his kingdom as strong as possible. Charlemagne was considered great because he was a strong ruler who brought about numerous changes in Europe. -effacing behavior in order not to provoke the displeasure and jealously of the people around him. For instance, Tacitus points out, Agricola “understood the feeling…resolved to root out the causes of rebellion…Beginning with himself and his staff, he enforced discipline in his own establishment first” (Tacitus 70). Thus Charlemagne would “enlarge his realm…[also] aimed at making his kingdom more attractive and at increasing public utility” (Charlemagne 71). Furthermore, the most important aspect of Charlemagne’s conquests, comparable to Agricola, was his uncanny ability to organize. Altogether Agricola and Charlemagne can both be seen as successful generals who were able to organize and make the area .
Common topics in this essay:
Agricola Charlemagne, Britain Agricola, Agricola Agricola, Furthermore Charlemagne, Agricola Tacitus, Tacitus Agricola, Moreover Tacitus, Moreover Agricola, agricola charlemagne, Importantly Charlemagne, charlemagne 71, |
Acceptance Essays
