"From Kelly Flinn to G.I. Jane, controversy has raged in recent months over whether women are fit for military service" (Brown 326). In the articles "Women Unfit for Combat? Au Contraire!" and "Women are not a Warrior Class," both authors convey their thoughts on women in combat. Both authors give many reasons why or why not women should be allowed to fight in combat. Timothy Brown, the author of "Women Unfit for Combat? Au Contraire!" gives many more strong examples to argue his case than the author of "Women are not a Warrior Class" and, consequently, has a more persuasive essay. To discourage women from considering combat rolls in the military, Paul Hackett, one of the authors of "Women are not a Warrior Class," made this bold statement in his argument,
             "Can women master the skills and strategies of combat as well as men?
             Yes. Can women mentally endure the rigors of combat as well as men?
             Yes. Can women meet the physical rigors of combat at the level
             required by the U.S. forces and, in particular, the U.S. Marine Corps?
             Is it fair to assume that women are incapable of having the stability to fight in combat? Brown uses the women commandos of Nicaragua who fought for their country to argue his point that if given the opportunity and encouragement, American women could effectively perform well in combat. Since the beginning of time, women have been viewed as the weaker sex. Through the years, the stature of women in society has grown, leading a way for women to become not the male's possession but his equal. This is not true all the time, especially when dealing with women in combat. James Collins another author of "Women Unfit for Combat" argues that when women are put in life-threatening conditions, many of them will rise to the challenge, but he doesn't believe that women should be allowed to be on the front line in comba
             ...