rAP CENORSHIP
Our society today largely views censorship as a method that has disappeared from liberal cultures since the enlightenment with the exception of restrictions in time of war. The enlightenment served to cripple the intolerance of incisive religious and government leaders, but did not obliterate censorship altogether. Instead, the job of expurgating unacceptable ideas has simply fallen into new hands using new tactics. Censors now assume the guise of capitalist retailers and distributors, special-interest groups, and less influential but still passionate religious and government authorities. Their new techniques are market-censorship (dominating the marketplace), constituitive censorship (the control of language), power-knowledge (restricting knowledge), as well as the traditional regulative censorship (law). These new forces can be as equally effective as the forces of remote history. We notice the effect of post-enlightenment civilization as early as the nineteenth-century in the great Russian humanist Aleksandr Herzin. Herzin left his native country in protest of Czarist censor . . .
The First Amendment to our Constitution allows us freedom of speech and press provided we do not violate any other laws in the process. Teenagers, who often display a tendency towards rebellion, are a perfect breading ground for the Tacitean Principle. The desire to express oneself is a deeply rooted characteristic of the human persona. the danger exists then of assuming that the other audience, the audience one does not converse with, is more passive, more manipulated, more vulgar in taste, than may be the case. It has been said that, The difference - and it’s an important difference - is that today’s salacious lyrics are not the exception to otherwise generally accepted sexual standards and community values, but a symbol of their collapse (Gross 1990). It is not present in everyone, and not everyone who feels this passion has the talent neccessary to succeed as an artist. I think if you’re going to work in the arts, the question is, is this considered good work? It would be a terrible thing if we all conspired to keep them from being able to make a record because we disagreed with what they have to say. Changing the course of music through censorship is not a viable solution. It relies on man's educability and his free exercise of conscience in moral issues. Knowledge may help us to rule or survive the rule of others (Jansen 1991). Today we become offended by explicit sex or violence or language pertaining to such threats to morality.
Common topics in this essay:
Frank Zappa, Tacitean Principle, Herbert Marcuse, Art Art, Bill Rights, Pornography COP, Molly Gross, Curry Jansen, Commission FCC, Hixon Introduction, record companies, popular music, billboard magazine vol, billboard magazine, magazine vol, magazine vol 101, vol 101, rock music, heavy metal, tacitean principle, music censorship, rodnitzky 1972, rock n' roll, john stuart mill, commission obscenity pornography, |