3 strikes and your out
The actual "law" has five major moving parts. First there is the ballot initiative (i.e. Proposition 184), then there is the actual statute that was passed, and then there are three other code sections that identify the types of violations that count as "strikes" against you. Those other types of sections are labeled juvenile felonies, serious felonies, or violent felonies. In 1997 the Wisconsin State Assembly voted 86-8 to approve what many supporters call a "truth- in- sentencing" bill. The bill proposed that convicts should serve no less than 100 percent of their sentences as a get-tough-on-crime measure. The bill also would require prisoners to be under community supervision for at least 25 percent of their prison time after they are released. Wisconsin prisoners would stay behind bars for their entire sentence without any chance for parole. Both Three Strikes and Truth In Sentencing legislation have been advocated as punitive and deterrence strategies for reducing violent crime within our communities. Three Strikes laws impose long prison sentences for third felony convictions. These laws are designed to curb repetitive serious criminal behavior. Washington State enacted the first law of this type in 1993. Since then,
Some of the benefits and costs of the new law are that if fully implemented, the new law will reduce serious felonies committed by adults in California between 22 and 34 percent. 3 billion in the incentives grants programs. 5 billion per year in current dollars . During the 1990's, after the creation of additional prison space and a concerted effort to fill it with repeat offenders, the rate dropped to 5. According to Clear, a mandatory sentence is a sentence stipulating that minimum period of incarceration must be served by people convicted of selected crimes, regardless of background or circumstance. The new three strikes law does not crack down on first-time serious offenders. 7 million people are confined in state, federal, and local correctional facilities. The state of Minnesota doesn't have an official three strikes law, although it does have a law mandating a life sentence for certain sexual offenders who commit a third sexual offense. But for all the alternatives to the new law, the cost would drop more than the effectiveness. To some people, a reduction in serious crime on the order of 30 percent would be attractive no matter what the cost. In defending the three strikes legislation, California Governor Pete Wilson stated that two-thirds of violent crime perpetrated by less than 10% of convicted felons. Health and welfare costs have been going up for a long time and show no sign of leveling off. The new three strikes law will double the fraction of the general fund consumed by the Department of Corrections. "When you get 10 years in prison, you stay in prison 10 years. In the 1980's, crime in Texas jumped 29% creating a ratio of eight crimes for every 100 citizens.
Common topics in this essay:
Pete Wilson,
Truth Sentencing,
Whites California,
David Diroll,
Corrections Consequently,
Thompson Wisconsin,
Wisconsin Assembly,
,
Department Justice,
Rapids Majority,
violent crime,
strikes law,
truth sentencing,
repeat offenders,
three-strikes law,
strikes truth sentencing,
serious crime,
serious felonies,
reducing violent,
convicted serious,
violent felonies,
reducing violent crime,
benefits costs law,
truth sentencing legislation,
violent crime communities,
|
Acceptance Essays
