Subjects:
I am unsure as to whether or not the book answered the question, for it is not truly a question that can be answered with any certainty without moving completely into abstract philosophy. The book does however grant one a great deal of insight into the nature of the question itself. Of course this insight, while essential, is nonetheless particularly difficult to ascertain, especially in such a context as this.
Dealing in outright representation there is a great deal that can be said for the book’s analysis of its own question:
-The book states Mankind is where it is because long ago it was set down that particular road by a separate, non-terrestrial party. It states this plausibly, of course. There are few other explanations, in fact, that better justify our chance existence to begin with, and aren’t simply variations of this idea as well. Does b
. . .
-The computer on board the ship Discovery, by the name of Hal-9000, seemed to be a fabrication of mankind.
This is an essential part in the question of what it means to be human.
Additionally, as humans sometimes do, Hal became neurotic and insecure. When I hear that an unidentified terrorist organization just toppled the World Trade Centers and murdered some three-thousand-odd people, all for sake of a personified deity, “Allah,” that might not even exist. Perhaps in the same way our inspiring gift of intelligence may seem to be an evolutionary inevitability. We turn to human constructs, relativity, ethics, science, etc. 3 Reactor at Chernobyl is on the verge of collapse, capable of sprinkling tons of radioactive dust on the surrounding countryside.
What may have been determined that the requisites of humanity are not to be found entirely within the physical world, if at all.
In any case, we seem to have strayed beyond the cycle nature intended. The thinking about this question serves not to find an answer, nor a purpose, the obviously the question has both.
Essay's Topics
All research is for reference purposes only.