Racial Profiling
The great era of civil rights started in the 1960s, with Martin Luther King, Jr.'s stirring "I have a Dream" speech at the historic march on Washington in August of 1963. At the same time Birmingham Police Commissioner "Bull" Connor used powerful fire hoses and vicious police attack dogs against nonviolent black civil rights activists. Although these years proved to be the highlight and downfall of civil rights in America, even with the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act being passed, time has repeated these tumultuous events again in the present. Racial profiling has been one of many civil rights issues concerning the unnecessary stopping and arresting of people based on race, color, ethnicity and gender. Skin-color has become evidence of the propensity to commit crime, and police use this "evidence" against minority drivers on the road all the time. This practice is so common that the minority community has given it the derisive term, "Driving While Black or Brown" - a play on the real offense of "driving while intoxicated". Although many law enforcement officers defend themselves by saying they are fighting against the "War on Drugs" by arresting these law offende
No matter how hard the outside world tries to find the culprit, the officer can easily protect or defend themselves because of their high position as a law protector. Today, skin-color makes you a suspect in America. Also, there should be advising law enforcement officers and people appointed from each civil rights division in the government. SB 44, a bill sponsored by Senator Richard Polanco, encourages state and local governments to conduct outreach programs. Fueled by the "War on Drugs", this fight has given police a pretext to target people who they think fit a "drug courier" or "gang member" profile. This solution can only work if districts, departments, and law enforcement officers can truthfully carry out these procedures. Because of this problem, the committee will evaluate the area, and observe data written by law enforcement officers, to see if plausible reasons have caused the stopping of a minority. The officers, many of whom are white, are encouraged to target minorities first to fill their ticket quotas for the month. Many bills have been passed to help and protect minorities, who can bring their cases all the way to court, however, sometimes the officers being accused are not found. The blame is almost easier to put on the minorities because of their difference to the "American Culture", as almost to say that minorities are not part of the American Culture. Racial profiling has been a long and disconcerting problem in the United States. It makes you more likely to be stopped by a law enforcement officer, more likely to be searched, and more likely to be arrested and imprisoned. Official skin-color prejudice is still reflected throughout the criminal justice system. If the racial profiling is targeted and found, the committee shall be the one who files complaints to the Attorney General, and that certain department or law enforcer will be detained to consequences can be established. Hillside officers defend themselves saying that Hillside is 40 percent black and 20 percent Hispanic.
Common topics in this essay:
Los Angeles,
War Drugs,
Black Brown,
Integrity Act,
Rights Act,
Enforcement Oversight,
Constitution Federal,
Hispanic African,
Gray Davis,
NAACP ACLU,
law enforcement,
racial profiling,
civil rights,
law enforcement officers,
enforcement officers,
driving black brown,
department racial,
defend themselves,
enforcement officer,
driving black,
black brown,
police departments,
law enforcement officer,
enforcement trust integrity,
law enforcement trust,
|
Acceptance Essays
