Education
. Kozol feels that the way in which we fund public schools is arcane and unfair (54). Since mostareas in the US rely on property tax in order to fund education, the poorer districts are at adisadvantage over the wealthy districts because of lack of income. This is a problem because thewealthy schools keep getting wealthier and the poor schools keep getting poorer. For exampleKozol points to the inner city schools of Chicago in comparison with a suburban high school(New Trier). He states that the schools like New Trier receive about $90000 more dollars a yearthan the inner city schools, when the inner city schools could really use that money to fix up thefacilities, improve the curriculum, and provide the teachers with better salaries and resources. Ifyou take a look at the arguments being made on pages 54-56 you will see that Kozol pointsspecifically to the property tax as a problem in education funding. "The very poor communitiesplace high priority on education, and they often tax themselves at higher rates than do the very The problem with this is that even though the lower class is taking more money and tryingto put it towards education, it is not going to even o
This system takes away money from thedistricts that actually need it and gives it back to the districts that would not hurt one bit if theyhad to go without an extra $50000 a year or so. The liberals believe that things should benefit everyone insociety as a whole regardless of race, creed, education, income, where you love, and so on. I agree thatthere is an unfair burden that hangs over those not only in really urban areas, but also in extremelyrural cases as in the school district 20 minutes down the street from me. He wants what is the best for everyone, not just one specific group. I was fortunate enough to attend a schoolsystem that offered a wide array of opportunities and had lots of property tax money to distributeamong the schools and curriculums to keep it interesting, innovative, and exciting. I have never been in a situation where I had to settlefor the "second best" when it came to education. There is nothing that any Conservative could say to me that could make me change mymind about the way that I feel education should be funded. ut because the suburbs have more moneycoming back to them that they can throw at schools in order to finance education. He suggests that a property tax is not the solution to theproblem because it is not doing anything for the poor districts except setting them farther behindthe really wealthy districts. This is an issue thatappeared a lot in Kozol's discussion and will be brushed upon again here and there later on in theessay. Theydo not really give a care about what is good for society, they only care about what is best forthemselves. He also stateson these pages that consistent inequality of education will lead to continued inequality all throughthe loves of children of urban areas. Everyone isfundamentally entitled to an education that provides them with great opportunities for when theyare faced with problems in the "real world". As quoted by Kozol from theChicago Tribune magnet schools are essentially "private school systems operated within the publicschools.
Common topics in this essay:
,
Conservative Kozol,
Chicago Tribune,
Liberal Conservative,
Savage Inequalities,
property tax,
Collins York,
inner city schools,
savage inequalities,
inner city,
city schools,
schools getting,
education system,
wealthy districts,
poor schools,
private school,
bleeding heart liberal,
bleeding heart,
|
Acceptance Essays
