Homosexual marriages
Homosexuals should be allowed to marry because the disallowance of it violates their constitutional rights. Marriage is an institution long recognized by our government under the right to pursue happiness, and denying that right to any couple, regardless of gender, is unconstitutional. This argument, though, is not disputed. In fact, none of the arguments raised in opposition to the allowance of homosexual marriages takes into account the constitutional rights afforded to all humans. The arguments are only in relation to the possible repercussions (real or imagined) of granting these rights. Our nation was built and has always been based on the fundamental principles of freedom expressed in the Declaration of Independence and through our Constitution. The opponents of homosexual marriage need to remember what freedom means to America, and understand the significance of setting a precedent that denies that freedom.The Supreme Court has long recognized that the institution of marriage is one of the rights guaranteed to all Americans by our Constitution. In the case of Loving vs. Virginia, the Supreme Court said, "The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal
all (arguments) seem to echo the debates heard in the late 1960's when the morality of racially mixed marriages was being debated. The argument is that children of same-sex marriages will suffer psychological problems, as evidenced by the children now who are suffering psychological effects because of family breakups and single-sex parenting ("Kids With Gay Parents"). These reasons against gay marriage only deal with the consequences of what may happen if this is allowed. various studies of families with same-sex and opposite sex parents. This is saying that religious grounds cannot determine constitutional law. One only needs to change a few words in the present day arguments against gays and lesbian marriage in order to produce replicas of those earlier racist statements. Arguments that deal with how homosexual marriages will affect children is a very touch subject. Itani 3The First Amendment states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. It is all speculation and has nothing to do with what is already a constitutional right. The problem is not with single-sex parenting but with single parenting. Following the Constitution of the United States is what gave America the strength to pull through those rough times and strive for a brighter day when all are viewed on as equal. showed that genders of the parents are unimportant to the quality of child-rearing, but that family breakdowns are very harmful to children. Women are stronger for them, African-Americans are stronger for them, religions are stronger for them, parents arestronger for them, children are stronger for them, the working class is stronger for them, so the why shouldn't homosexuals be stronger for them. Unfortunately, this is not the case.
Common topics in this essay:
Deb Price,
Win Despite,
Marriages Homosexuals,
Gay Parents,
Eric Black,
Declaration Independence,
Supreme Court,
United America,
Steve Chapman,
Independence Constitution,
homosexual marriages,
supreme court,
same-sex marriages,
constitutional rights,
constitutional rights afforded,
single-sex parenting,
gay parents,
kids gay,
marriages allowed,
rights afforded,
kids gay parents,
homosexual marriages allowed,
allowance homosexual,
|
Acceptance Essays
