In this paper, I will try to explain the puzzle of whether individuals are products of society or society is a product of individuals. I believe that in general, and in the beginning, the answer to this question, is that culture is a human product. I will start by presenting early man, the hunter and gatherer as the first form of society, but lacking critical qualities of a society. Then I will continue to support my theory by analyzing the beginning of known society some three and one half thousand years ago. I will present the individual as a creation of society, or more precisely, an ongoing social recursive conditioning. I will also give society as the creation of individuals. Finally, I will conclude my paper with some thoughts on the paradox of who is the product and who is the producer of the individual and society.
             According to Charles Darwin, man developed from the ape. Darwin's theory of evolution appears to be unsupported though because for thousands of years these apes have been there, but none of them have developed into human beings nor did Darwin ever find the missing link. Although unproven, there must be a process of evolution. And if there was an evolutionary process, a few of the steps in-between still must be missing. Since man is not asexual, the man did not, and could not, survive or prosper by himself. Early man grouped with other hunters and gathers to form a family which brought order, direction, and stability to his life. According to Rousseau, "the earliest and only natural societies are families (Primis 192)." The point here is that individuals choose to become a part of something larger than the individual.
             But if Rousseau is correct, there was a time when the individual gave up certain freedoms to find security within a group. This is contra to Thomas Hobbes view. It was not until significant scientific advances in the nineteenth century that the view of this seventeenth-century philosopher Hobbes ...