nature vs nurture
The relative contributions of nature and nurture are an apparent part of human development which makes us ask the question, are heredity and environment opposing forces?(Sternberg 100) The question of nature vs. nurture can be examined and can be attempted to be comprehended in many ways. Our stand on which theory is the correct one is obviously a matter of opinion and makes us wonder if only one of them is truly correct. Nurture seems to be the explanation that holds the most tangible evidence to support it as existing in our everyday life. In psychological attempts to conduct experiments of genetic influences on personality and behavior in the environment psychologists have come to the conclusion that the best way is by using identical twins. There are strong similarities identical twins show in intelligence, personality, and many other characteristics, regardless of being raised in separate homes. They leave us with the conclusion that maybe there is some truth to the theory of nature. These findings from the studies done on the twins are what I find to be coincidences. I believe from my past experiences with my development as a person compared to my older sisters, we are a perfect example
Through a process of assimilation we try to "restore cognitive equilibrium by incorporating new information into existing schemes" (Sternberg 340). Personality development continues throughout the life span as a result of every new experience within that environment. He has the belief that life is composed of changes in which everyone must go through. The question of whether humans are the result of predisposed genetics or if their lives and personalities are shaped by the surrounding environment does not have a correct answer that exists. This is why Piaget's view of development supports nurture. nurture hold a substantial amount of evidence supporting each idea about how we become who we are. I value the strong significance of friendships that I have built in my life while the most valued aspect of her life holds her love for working with children. We have both internalized the lessons and virtues we were raised to make our own, yet, grew up to become completely different beings. The theory that poses enough evidence through studies and in my personal experience seems to be true. One must act upon and accommodate themselves to this new stimuli (Sternberg 340). Nurture is proved simply through the personality differences between my sister and I. Still, I feel that learned behavior fosters all the elements that make nurture the most prominent reason for our progression in developing our minds and personalities.
Common topics in this essay:
,
Jean Piaget,
Obviously Erikson,
Erik Erikson,
vs nurture,
personality development,
nature vs,
nature vs nurture,
theory personality development,
sternberg 340,
nurture theory,
life span,
supports nurture,
identical twins,
theory personality,
|
Acceptance Essays
