Using Animals in Research is Not Justified
According to Baldwin Elizabeth's report the population of chimpanzees has drastically come down from 2,000,000 to 150,000 chimpanzees. On the similar lines, number of rabbits has declined from 3,000,000,000 to mere 1,500,000. Today, millions of animals are used in research, because of which not only chimpanzees' and rabbits' population are dropping down, but also other animals' like dogs, mice, sharks, pigs, etcetera's population are dropping down.In the United States, in many cases of Scientific Research, animals are used to test out specific products that are yet to become consumer products; usually the testing is for other medical purposes. There is a recurring argument of whether or not using animals in research is justified. Many people, usually scientists believe that animal testing is justified. However, I beg to differ because humans and animals are too different to make animal research any useful for humans, animal testing is cruel and unjustified, and animals too have moral rights. The reason for first argument has been rightly explained by Kowalski Kathiann, according to whose article, thousands of chimpanzees bred in the 1980s for AIDS research because 98 percent of chimpanzees have same DNA that humans have.
I, like most people, am also against practices of using animals to determine if cosmetic products are harmful. We have some alternatives for animal research. However, when tests are performed a certain number of times and nothing more can be gained, they need to stop. Animal testing showed it to have no serious side effects. Researchers behave very cruelly and unjustly with the animals during the research, and animals have some moral rights, which are as important as humans. " And even more recent example is the once popular diet fenfluramine-phentermine (fenphen). According to Baldwin Elizabeth's report during the research on relationship between smoking and lung cancer, the dogs were being forced to breathe nicotine-laden smoke through a tube in their throats and because of that some of them died. Researchers can also use computer in any kind of drug research as computers can provide them with clues such as - how drugs might affect a person's respiratory or circulatory system instead of opting for animal research. The negative publicity and consumer pressure surrounding these practices prompted many cosmetic companies to stop testing their products on animals and begin labeling their wares as "cruelty free. They cannot use the healthy animal for their research. Even though an animal could be somewhat dangerous and is sent off to medical research, it seems as if the animal is being given a cruel and unjust punishment. Furthermore, animal testing is cruel and unjustified. This proves that reliance on animal studies can lead to a false sense of security. The newly formed English pharmaceutical company, "Thermogene" has started its research only on rational drug design and other nonanimal research technique to develop its new drugs. The third and the final reason is that animals too have moral rights.
Common topics in this essay:
Testing Essay,
Kowalski Kathiann,
Baldwin Elizabeth's,
Scientific Research,
animal research,
animal testing,
animals research,
animals moral rights,
research animals,
using animals,
moral rights,
animals moral,
using animals research,
According Baldwin,
according baldwin elizabeth's,
animal research researchers,
rights live,
elizabeth's report,
rights humans,
baldwin elizabeth's report,
|
Acceptance Essays
