In the middle of this century, bot biological and cultural
anthropology experiences a major change in theory. In biological
anthropology, biological anthropologists adopted an approach which
on the gene. They saw the human evolution as the process of genetic
adaptation to the environment. In the mean time, there were also
analogies to evolution. Cultural evolution also followed a process of
In the field of anthropology, a very important theory is that of
sociobiologists. Sociobiologists focus on adaptation and reproductive
success rather than progress toward perfection. Edward O. Wilson was
of the most important of them. He adopted an approach that focused on
level of the gene. He saw social behavior as controlled, in principle,
particular genes, and he saw evolution as occurring at this level
reproductive success amounted to increasing the frequency of certain
in future generations. However, the insistence of sociobiologists on
grounding at least some behavior in universal human genetic
runs contrary to cultural anthropologists' emphasis on the primacy of
culture itself as the determinant of human social life.
Several distinct approaches can be identified in contemporary
sociobiology. The first one is evolutionary psychology. Evolutionary
psychology is concerned primarily with the analysis of the mind as a
device formed by natural selection. The second focus is human
ecology. It emphasized populations rather than cultures, human
biology, as well as evolutionary ecology. The difference from
psychology is that it focuses on testing the hypotheses that culturally
patterned traits actually enhance fitness rather than mind. The third
approach involves the search for human universals. People advocating
kind of approach concentrate on discovering the characteristics found
all human societies. (McGee and Warms, 1996)
However, this universal evolution point of view is rej...