creation andverses evolution
Ever since the publication of Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species was published, there has been an ongoing debate between science and religion. Scientists have formulated many theories as to the origins of man and to the creation of the earth, whereas religious groups have one main creation theory, based on the "Genesis" story of The Bible. These theories, however, are not the cause of the debate because the different theories are simply myths meant to explain the unknown. The debate is caused by different belief systems. The main difference between creationists and scientists is the way they fight this debate. Creationists have developed their own science: Creation Science. Creation scientists look to prove that creation is right and science is wrong, providing selective interpretations of the fossil record. But their interpretations are exaggerated and foolish. Creationists will pick one scientific theory and do everything they can to point out it's flaws, disregarding what they can't prove wrong. They will often use emotions to control the public to their side. They spend their time trying to discover false evolution rather than teaching their beliefs to the general public. The theory of evolution removes humans from th
Within the scientific group, evolution has been widely accepted as fact. They believe simply through faith in The Bible. Also, they don't acknowledge that biologists have seen evolution occur, in the case of moth's wings changing color for protection against their prey . Now it is believed that they are strictly a side group that became extinct. The only thing that is being questioned and has not been proven is the history of species. It exists and has been proven time and time again with examples such as the jaw bones of reptiles migrating over thousands of years into the ear bones of mammals and the human anatomy showing that we were once long ago quadrupeds. In order for this debate to ever end, some common ground must be reached. However, instead of examining the actual evidence, creationists explain the scientific side of the issue by taking small bits and pieces of evidence and quotes from scientists to back up their claims. Evolutionists mainly spend their time in the debate defending themselves. Yes, some scientists use clever slander to show false creation, but the majority stay well within the regions of what they know about. "Standing on the Shoulders of Midgets" The Humanist, Jan/Feb 1988(11, 42). The creation science argument has constantly said that what they do is use scientific evidence to show that creation happened, but what they are really doing is trying to prove evolution wrong. Religious believers have a tendency to believe that only their theories can be correct.
Common topics in this essay:
Bible Scientists,
Science Creation,
Jimmy Swaggart,
Morris Parker,
Origin Species,
Humanist Jan/Feb,
creation science,
Mirsky Steven,
Conroy Glenn,
Cited Bible,
Parker Gary,
creation scientists,
1997 reconstructing human,
origins ww norton,
paperbacks york,
york conroy,
glenn 1997,
conroy glenn,
1997 reconstructing,
harper paperbacks,
norton company york,
ww norton company,
company york,
reconstructing human,
human origins ww,
|
Acceptance Essays
