Ethics of Cloning
The rapid development of the technology for cloning has led to moral debates around the world on whether or not to ban creating human clones. With the advancement of clone technology two states, California and Michigan have already banned the cloning of humans. "Everybody who thought it would proceed slowly and could be stopped was wrong, said Lee Silver, a professor from the University of Princeton (McFarling) . . ." Without proper research on behalf of the politicians of California and Michigan, the premature ban should be reconsidered and appealed. Cloning could provide a way for infertile couples to produce children genetically similar to themselves, a method of creating spare organs for transplants, and a cure for genetic disease. Human cloning may provide numerous benefits to mankind and should not be banned. Cloning is the Creation of another person that is an exact copy of another person (Clarke); this leaves too much to the imagination and leads to misunderstanding of the methods scientists use in cloning. In more clear terms, cloning is the process in which DNA of a female egg is replaced with different DNA from another cell. This process is referred to as the Nuclear Transfer or Nuclear Substitution. DNA mol
The benefits of cloning are innumerable to the medical field and could revolutionize potentially fatal procedures. Studies have shown that identical twins who are raised apart often share similar personalities and intelligence, even though possessed of entirely different experience and background. A genetic defect is a mutation in which the DNA has been altered and caused an abnormality in the body. The protein could then be extracted and used in human treatments for various diseases or disorders (Dumesic). If God was the original "cloner" when he created Eve from Adam's rib, and Jesus was a clone of god. Humankind could benefit greatly from this new technology, and it should not be banned. Other things that have been cloned include blood clotting factors for hemophiliacs, and plans to create specialized nerve cells to repair brain damage have begun (McFarling). This will eliminate the need for anti-rejection drugs and provide for a healthier recovery. Their genes could be used in gene therapy, and help to strengthen peoples immune systems so they too can rid their bodies of these diseases. It shares none of the same memories, knows none of the same people, and it will experience completely different things. People who wish to have a child, could be tested for possible mutations in the DNA, and a genetic solution could be created and injected into the still developing egg (Blaese). Diabetes is a disease in which the cells cannot accept sugars from the blood without the help of insulin from either injection or oral pills. Simple tissues such as skin cells have already been cloned in laboratories for use in skin grafts for burn victims. Ensuring that the families genes are passed on to future generations would be more appealing to parents than adoption or using sperm and eggs from an unrelated donor.
Common topics in this essay:
Substitution DNA,
Richard Seed,
Blaese Diabetes,
Blaese Mutations,
California Michigan,
Cloning Creation,
,
Eve Adam's,
Princeton McFarling,
cloning technology,
human cloning,
gene therapy,
Lee Silver,
genetic structure,
cloning technology genetic,
egg replaced,
california michigan,
replaced dna,
banned cloning,
aids cancer,
cloning provide,
egg replaced dna,
provide infertile couples,
replaced dna cell,
female egg replaced,
|
Acceptance Essays
