Cloning How Far Will it Go1
Everyday people find themselves at a crossroads that requires a decision as to which path to follow. In the past few years, scientists have gained knowledge about cloning that could impact our lives for centuries to come. As a society we are at a crossroads and we will have to decide how to use this knowledge. Will we choose to increase our power over nature or will we develop a partnership? There are many benefits of cloning, but do they outweigh the possibility of losing genetic diversity, facing genetic discrimination, and the scary consequences portrayed in science fiction books like Brave New World and 1984, and movies like Gattaca and Planet of the Apes. ?Cloning is the production of a genetically identical duplicate of an organism? (Hawley 1). In a sense, many plants, algae, unicellular organisms, and even humans naturally produce identical offspring. For example, the dandelion reproduces asexually to create a copy of itself. As a species it has reached a plateau and can no longer progress. Within the human species, identical twins are essentially clones. The division of the embryo produces two embryos with the exact same genetic information. The consequence of a species only pr
If genes are used to determine how successful one will be, then why can?t someone say that it wasn?t his fault that he murdered a person, it was his bad genes that caused him to do it? The complexities of human life would be lost if we allowed genes to determine one?s ability to succeed, instead of allowing personality traits like leadership, spunk, and passion to be the key to achieving success. It is obvious that the environment one lives in, significantly affects the road they will travel through life. Without diversity, one disease could wipe out the whole population because no person would be able to fight a disease any better than anyone else. If it were found that one race commonly had impaired motor skills, then the whole race would be branded as inept. It would be unrighteous to eliminate the possibility of climbing to the top of society?s ladder by shackling people to the lower class based on genes. Discoveries can lead to progress or regression, depending on who controls the information. Human life would lose its preciousness and become too manufactured and controllable. It is human nature to want to discover new things. Also, the clone would not be considered a different person because the clone would be filling the void of the original person. Instead of allowing nature to work its cycle of survival of the fittest, humans have chosen once again to speed the process along in hopes of creating a better species of genetically enhanced humans. ? In Brave New World, cloning leads to a culture with no sense of nature; everything is developed on the production line. It would be a grave mistake to allow society to use science to achieve its idealized image of perfection. In Brave New World, the people not only couldn?t decide their future, but they couldn?t choose what they wanted to wear or who to be friends with. The clone has the same genes, but still may be a different height, weight, and have a different personality. And now we must live everyday knowing we killed millions of innocent people.
Common topics in this essay:
Brave World,
Ethan Hawke,
Apes Cloning,
Cloning Everyday,
Jennifer Nii,
Jennifer Biotechnology,
World Reporter,
brave world,
genetic information,
Publishing Company,
human life,
knowledge cloning,
Aaron Cloning,
benefits cloning,
Martins Press,
genetic diversity,
arise cloning,
april 2000,
original person,
heart disease,
|