Genetics3
Why is AIDS so difficult to cure? How does the AIDS virus attack the body?a In 1979, the first reported AIDS case occurred in New York, and by mid-June 1981, unusual immune system failure among gay men was surfacing in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) initially name the disease GRID, or gay-related immune deficiency, because it was prominently found among homosexuals. It appeared to be a lifestyle-associated illness, linked to excessive stress to the immune system. Researchers believed that a highly infectious agent, which depleted T cells and could be transmitted through intercourse, blood, or blood products from mother to fetus, caused GRID. In July of 1982, the disease was renamed AIDS, or Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. Since then, the disease's origins, the factors affecting it, the causes behind it, the symptoms arising from it, the groups at risk from it, and the practices leading to it have been widely and comprehensively researched. Despite painstaking efforts and billions of dollars spent on research, despite the numerous drugs created to control and relieve its various symptoms, there is still no cure for it. We ask the question, "Why?".
It attacks the body by attacking the immune system, making the person susceptible to and defenseless against many infections that he or she would normally be able to fight off easily. Even before Darwin published his theory, Spencer was already thinking in terms of elitist, "might makes right" sorts of views. Charles Darwin (1809-82) wrote Origin of the Species, which was published in 1859. HIV's coat of protein fits the receptors in certain types of white blood cells (T cells) in the human immune system. Usually, when DNA is replicated in a cell, there is constant proofreading and repair to ensure that the correct type of DNA is being made. A retrovirus is a type of virus that contains RNA and produces a DNA analog (or counterpart) of its RNA by using a highly error-prone enzyme known as reverse transcriptase. Its doctrine was that the principles of biological evolution should be applied to human society. However, there is hope for AIDS victims in the sense that scientists in the future will be able to make several drugs, which will be taken in combination. In The Man Versus the State (1884) he argued that London's "good-for-nothings" ought not to be kept alive by charity but left to perish, for this was the "universal law of nature. It seems that Social Darwinism's effects were all bad, but we must also take into consideration its good effects, which include the move to provide resources for those genuinely needing of support, and the call for hard work and to strive to make the quality of life better, and the need to "move" ourselves and not just depend on handouts. Although popular in the late 19th century, it has been widely attacked in modern times. This makes DNA made from the viral RNA very different from what is coded therein.
Common topics in this essay:
HIV HIV's,
DNA AIDS,
Social Darwinism,
Darwinism Darwin,
Origin Species,
Social Darwinism's,
Deficiency Syndrome,
Control CDC,
Law Nature,
Engineering Activity,
social darwinism,
immune system,
19th century,
survival fittest,
natural selection,
concept natural selection,
social darwinist,
applied social,
darwinism justify,
darwinian ideas,
popular late,
justify eugenics programs,
popular late 19th,
aids difficult cure,
late 19th century,
|