Feedback Form

Get immediate access to thousands of

 high quality papers and essays.
Mega Essays Home  |   Questions?  |   Acceptable Use  |   Customer Care  |   Site Search
    Enter Essay Topic:

   

    Subjects:
Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Papers
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology

    Login:
Member Login
Join Now!
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

NeoNazis And Free Speech

Neo-Nazi's are entitled to the same First Amendment rights under the Constitution as all other American citizens. Simply because a group expresses beliefs which are unpopular and generally considered to be "wrong" does not mean that the group is no longer entitled to free speech. When people are given true freedom of speech, it should be understood that there are always going to be differences in opinions, and that the opinions held by some people will almost invariably be seen as offensive to at least some other people. If the government were to try and censor everything that anyone felt was offensive, then eventually no one would be able to voice their opinion on anything anymore, and the problem with censoring Neo-Nazis and other extreme racist groups is that it opens the door to just this sort of thing. What's more, no one is being forced to listen to anything that the Neo-Nazi's have to say, so the argument that they are causing people irreparable "mental anguish" is just plain invalid because anyone who doesn't agree with what they have to say can just walk away. The people who think that the Neo-Nazi's should be censored simply because their ideas are hurtful to other people need to grow up and real


If someone says something which you find offensive, then you are free to tell them that you think they are wrong, and argue your point, or free to walk away. The people who say that Neo-Nazis are evil, should be eradicated from our society, and do not deserve the most basic of human rights are really no better than the Neo-Nazis themselves, but what they say has never been called into question, simply because they represent the majority, and their opinion is typically considered to be the correct one. The ideas will continue to exist even if the public expression of them is banned, and because of this, the hate crimes will continue to be an issue, even if Neo-Nazis are denied the right to publicly state their beliefs. Also, although the Neo-Nazi philosophy may advocate violence and lead to an increased number of hate crimes, this is not a reason to revoke their First Amendment rights either. Although other democratic countries have historically censored Neo-Nazi and other racist ideologies and been successful while doing so does not make this action right, nor does it make not censoring wrong. Censorship has already gone to far in this country, from words which aren't allowed to be said on television or radio (after all, words are just a collection of sounds which represent an idea, and no one should have the right to say that certain ideas are not allowed to be thought, or communicated), to the well intentioned, though somewhat oppressive sexual harassment laws which have people being sued for complimenting their coworkers (when this sort of thing starts happening, you know you have a problem. You do not, however, have the right to say that simply because you don't agree with what they are saying that they are not to be allowed to say it. While other countries have censored unpopular beliefs, this does not mean that we should or are obligated to follow in their footsteps, and if we did follow their example, we would be going against the very thing which this country was founded to protect, namely, individual freedom. Besides this point, stopping the open public expression of Neo-Nazi ideas will not stop the crimes. I believe that although most Neo-Nazis are uneducated racists, the truly violent Neo-Nazis make up only a small extremist fringe within the overall group. Also, if a Neo-Nazi rally becomes a riot because of spectators who heckle and harass the Neo-Nazis, then the riot is just as much the fault of the spectators as it is the Neo-Nazis, and if you were to censor the Neo-Nazis because of the riots, then you would also have to censor the people with anti-Neo-Nazi beliefs as well. Although words can be hurtful at times, if someone says something that people find offensive, then they can just not listen, rather than crying to the government and asking it to hold their hands and protect them from the world.

Common topics in this essay:
Constitution American, United America, Censoring Neo-Nazi, , neo-nazi ideas, Neo-Nazis Amendment, amendment rights, Bibliography None, hate crimes, words words, beliefs people, free speech, public expression, unpopular beliefs,

See the rest of the paper. Join Now!

Approximate Word count = 1006
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here

Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900



CREDIT CARD
ONLINE CHECK
JOIN BY PHONE



Get immediate access to over 100,000
high quality term papers and essays!!!

Webmasters make $$$!



All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright (c) 2001-2009 Mega Essays LLC
All rights reserved. DMCA HMS