Saving the animals

In Buffalo New York on October 23rd of last year, Dr. Barnett Slepian was murdered. He wasn’t killed because of his financial status or because of a dispute he had with a patient. Someone who never really knew Dr. Slepian, someone who never met his family, a person who didn’t agree with Dr. Slepian’s job, took his life. This is a great example to show how a disagreement in ideology can lead to actions that no one has the authority to take.

An animal liberator bombing a meat processing plant is like the pro-life activist killing the doctor who performs abortions. Both of the actions don’t achieve the results that are intended, they both claim that they help save the lives of the innocent, and they are both hypocritical. The results that are wanted can not be achieved through causing pain and suffering to the opposing party.

When a sniper took the life of Dr. Slepian he was trying to move the cause of pro-life forward. The end result was not what he had wanted; the medical community was outraged and the people who believed in the right to choose strengthened their resolve. This quote by Dr. Henry Morgentaler, the country’s best-known pro-abortion crusader, illustrates this point very accurately.

. . .

View the whole essay, without interruption

The other assumption that eliminating a person from the pool will help lower animal deaths is wrong.

In conclusion, the intended result is not possible through the destruction of property. com/WORLD/americas/ 9811/23/BC-CANADA-ABORTION. The people in both cases believe that they can help promote their case by using force. Even if the bomber would bomb every single meat-processing plant in the country, intrepid businessmen would find ways to meet the demand in the country. What is ironic in this situation is that the same results could probably have been achieved through peaceful means and not with such brutal force. It bespeaks their frustration and rage at the fact that they have not been able to convince the public of the rightness of their cause," (Cnn 2)

The frustration that Dr. Even though a few animals might be saved through the action of the bomber, human life is still more valuable.

The definition of a hypocrite is a person who pretends to be what he is not. Both of the actions don’t achieve the results that are intended, they both claim that they help save the lives of the innocent, and they are both hypocritical. Taking the life of another human being is unjustifiable; no one has the authority to commit such a crime. In the abortion doctor’s case the assassin believes he will help the innocent fetus.

Approximate Word count = 981
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.