Affermative Action
Affirmative Action Affirmative Action efforts were started in 1964 to end the long history ofoverlooking qualified people of color and women from higher education. AffirmativeAction sets standards for a business or office of admissions, so that a white man does nothave the upper-hand over an equally or greater educated minority. The initial way thegovernment tried to justify Affirmative Action was to develop a human resourceapproach: first identifying the problem, which is racism then establishing the solution(Phillips 67). The intent of Affirmative Action helps cut down discrimination in the work placeand in schools, despite the fact that some believe that affirmative action is a form ofreverse discrimination. In contrast, the first goal of Affirmative Action was to helppeople who were poor or badly educated, elevating them to positions for which they werenot objectively qualified (Buckley 95). Cousens, author of Public Civil Rights Agenciesand Fair Employment indicates that the Affirmative Action techniques have theadvantage of not only persuading employers not to discriminate when hiring or accepting,
Some might believe that thiscould be just a random occurrence, but the same results showed in the University ofTexas Law School's enrollment, three blacks this fall to last years fifty-nine (Applebomea14). Therefore, Affirmative Action is legitimate because it does reduce discrimination in thework place and related areas such as University acceptance of college students. As Rosenbaum pointed out,discrimination does still exist in our not so perfect world, and so far Affirmative Action isour only solution; so why is California trying so hard to put an end to it? AbolishingAffirmative Action is not the answer. "Clinton Defends Preference Programs, Backs Reforms. In theend, it should in no way be abolished. Yet critics thinkthat Affirmative Action is a cleverly disguised form of racism and ineffective, but takinga look at what happens when there is no Affirmative Action, such as in the court case ofHopwood V. A court ruling said that the University of Scott3Texas Law School was banned from using race at all in their admitting. " This might be true in some maybe all cases, but in this very true rebuttal to Graglia's statement Rodney Ellis, Texas state senator, graduate of the University LawSchool in 1976 says "I clearly got in through an Affirmative Action program, and I don'tapologize for it.
Common topics in this essay:
Affirmative Action,
affirmative action,
Scott2 Affirmative,
Union Proposition,
President Clinton,
National Review,
York Times,
Action America,
Law School,
Howard University's,
Law School's,
law school,
applebome a14,
enrollment blacks,
president clinton,
world affirmative action,
rights agencies,
proposition 209,
civil rights,
abolishing affirmative,
action negative,
abolishment affirmative action,
public civil rights,
abolishing affirmative action,
affirmative action negative,
|
Acceptance Essays
