secondhand smoking
“A blockbuster study published in the January issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) examined the impact of exposure to ETS on the progression of athersclerosis (hardening of the arteries) and concluded, in part, that the arteries of non-smokers exposed to ETS thickened 20% faster than non-smokers with no second-hand exposure” (JAMA). Another study published in Pediatrics in January estimated that, “about half of the cases of early childhood cases of asthma, chronic bronchitis and wheezing are attributable to exposure to secondhand smoke” (JAMA). Smoking in public areas such as bars and restaurants can be harmful to the health of not only the smoker himself, but everybody around him. Recent studies on the number of deaths as a result of smoking confirmed that eight out of ten people affected with diseases affiliated with smoking were a cause of second hand smoke. Laws are in the process of being passed to make certain places completely non-smoking. Why should a person who has been careful about their health be subject to smoker’s health problems? Why should a family going out to dinner have to smell the smoke from someone else when the family has just as much righ . . .
Since then, certain actions have been taken to make restaurants and bars completely non-smoking. The case was soon dismissed and a lawyer wrote, “The true agenda of this action was patently obvious—to muzzle scientists whose research publications and speech on subjects relating to tobacco, tobacco control and the politics of tobacco have been a thorn in the side of the tobacco industry for decades” (qtd. The many new non-smoking laws in bars and restaurants have proved many times profitable to these public places. The research indicated that the regulations had no adverse economic effect on the restaurant industry. It seems as though everyone is getting involved in the prevention of public smoking and expressing their views on the subject. The majority seems to have a neutral attitude towards the new smoking laws. The smokers along with the increased amount of non-smokers were enough to actually boost the profits of these places. This is only fair to the non-smokers in the community and their health.
Common topics in this essay:
University Toronto, Public Health, North Carolina, Dr Glantz, Counties Oregon, JAMA Smoking, Dr Glanz’s, Non-smokers’ Rights, Association JAMA, Association BOMA, bars restaurants, public smoking, restaurants bars, smoking laws, tobacco companies, smoking public, north carolina, respondents reported avoided, pass legislation, completely non-smoking, regulations adverse, strongly public smoking, public bars restaurants, regulations adverse economic, dr glanz’s study, |
Acceptance Essays
