Marrying Homosexuals
Homosexuals should be allowed to marry because the disallowance of it violates their constitutional rights. Marriage is an institution long recognized by our government under the right to pursue happiness, and denying that right to any couple, regardless of gender, is unconstitutional. This argument, though, is not disputed. In fact, none of the arguments raised in opposition to the allowance of homosexual marriages takes into account the constitutional rights afforded to all humans. The arguments are only in relation to the possible repercussions (real or imagined) of granting these rights. Our nation was built and has always been based on the fundamental principles of freedom expressed in the Declaration of Independence and through our Constitution. The opponents of homosexual marriage need to remember what freedom means to America, and understand the significance of setting a precedent that denies that freedom.The Supreme Court has long recognized that the institution of marriage is one of the rights guaranteed to all Americans by our Constitution. On the Internet, you can find the full text of the following Supreme Court cases. In the case of Loving v. Virgini
Personally, I believe in the adage, "Do unto others as you would have done unto you. Any African-American should understand the importance of upholding the fundamental beliefs on which America was based. Other arguments that contend that overall society will be damaged by allowing homosexual marriages are that an increased burden will be placed on society by extending the economic and legal benefits of marriage to homosexual couples, that a vast number of laws and private company policies will have to be addressed and modified, and that the economic burden of all of this will fall on society. Bibliography Works CitedCleveland Board of Education v. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. The whole argument only works on the basis that there is something wrong with homosexuality. edu/Fed-Ct/Supreme/Flite/opinions/414US632. " In the case of Cleveland Board of Education v. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. The argument against homosexual marriage contends that homosexuals can not have committed relationships and remain faithful to one another. An internet article, Homosexual Marriages: Statement By "Hawaii's Future Today", says that various studies of families with same-sex and opposite-sex parents were quoted at the September 1996 Circuit Court trial in Hawaii, where the original case for homosexual marriage was tried. The same amendment that keeps religious grounds from determining law is the amendment that will allow the Church to continue denying homosexual marriages once they are allowed by the state.
Common topics in this essay:
Declaration Independence,
Psychiatric Institute,
Religious Aspects,
Circuit Court,
William Bennett,
Gail Stewart,
Holly Puterbaugh,
Supreme Court,
Homosexuals Homosexuals,
Fourteenth Amendment,
homosexual marriages,
homosexual marriage,
constitutional rights,
supreme court,
interracial marriages,
homosexual marriages religious,
fundamental beliefs,
homosexual couples,
allowance homosexual,
declaration independence,
marriages religious,
internet article homosexual,
article homosexual marriages,
allowance homosexual marriages,
message homosexuality okay,
|
Acceptance Essays
