Momentous Decisions
A momentous decision is an important decision, or a decision ofgreat consequence, that may affect a certain group of people to acertain extent, or it may affect the majority of people in many differentways. A momentous decision could also be an important decisionthat affects the majority of the population during that certain timeperiod, or maybe affects the future populations to come. Another point of view of a momentous decision is a once in a lifetimeevent that happens, even if its in a fiction book. Examples ofmomentous decisions vary greatly on topics and time periods. A fewexamples are: the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan,Huckleberry Finn's deciding he would rather go to Hell then betray hisfriend Jim, Rosa Park's decision not to move to the back of the bus,King Lear's decision to divide his land, the famous court trial; Roe vs.Wade, the Dred Scott decision, Romeo and Juliet's decision to be acouple, Solidarity's decision to resist the government of Poland, AungSan Suu Kyi's decision to resist the government of Myanmar, MartinLuther's decision to nail his Ninety-five Theses to the door of theWittenburg Cathedral, the decision of the New York Times to publish
Part of the problem the Scotts faced withthe delay was that Missouri was beginning to feel increasing politicalpressure over the question of slavery. Scottindeed had the right to sue for his freedom in federal court becausehe was a citizen by virtue of his residence in one of the United Statesof America. This decision sentthe US into fights between the disagreeing groups. On April 7th, 1854, Sandford and his attorney, Hugh A. All that remained of this case is the effects on society. Dred Scott was the slave of a United States Army surgeon,John Emerson of Missouri. This time, the Scotts basedtheir argument on the fact that Mrs. Other historians feel the suits mayhave been started by an attorney who felt he could make a largeamount of money form the case. This ruling had been long awaited and it was received bymany. Emerson's lawyerfilled a bill to have a new trial instead. Scott's arguments consists of him being aslave in the slave state of Missouri. The state found itself in anawkward position, since it was bordered on three sides by free states. If the new trialhad been accepted, it would have been transferred to the Missourisupreme court. Geyer was a respected member of the MissouriState Bar, and Reverdy Johnson was a former senator and attorneygeneral under President Zachary Taylor. The impact of the Dred Scott decision spread quicklythroughout the land.
Common topics in this essay:
Dred Scott,
,
Scott Emerson,
Judge Hamilton,
Court United,
Missouri Compromise,
Harriet Scott,
Finally February,
Missouri Scott,
Supreme Court,
dred scott,
supreme court,
dred scott decision,
scott decision,
harriet scott,
dred harriet,
civil war,
missouri compromise,
momentous decision,
scott emerson,
free free,
dred harriet scott,
dred scott slave,
supreme court united,
dred scott slavery,
|
Acceptance Essays
