Angus Young of the rock band AC/DC is what comes to mind when picturing a school uniform. His uniform or costume if you will, is that of an English schoolboy dressed in a suit type uniform but shorts instead of slacks and a funky hat. A group of small boys and girls all warring the same colored uniforms assembled in front of the catholic school down the street is another picture that comes to my mind when thinking about school uniforms.
This is what most people used to think about school uniforms. They have been attached to students of European and private schools. Such pictures of students dressing in school uniforms have led to stereotyping and a negative attitude towards schools enforcing a uniform policy. Displayed as robots without the ability to express them selves in a society that says you must express yourself and be an individual at all cost. The problem is that the cost to express yourself and be an individual is high in some cases, in Detroit, a 15-year-old boy was killed for his $86 basketball shoes (Tweeters 1997). I believe that cost is to high, it would be better to be laughed at and teased about warring a nerdy uniform, than to be shot by some gang member that did not like the color of the pants I’m warr
. . .
In 1995, the Texas legislature gave public school districts the authority to require uniforms under Texas State Law 11. This is a great safety issue in today’s times where it is important to regulate who comes on campuses. I don’t have children but I am a stakeholder because if the uniform policy is voted on and passed the chances are my local school tax will increase to help pay for the new uniforms. It will affect, children, adults, and elderly in one way or another, some more than others will. Their decisions go from the smallest detail, what colors, what style, what material, all or which can have either positive or negative effects on other stakeholders. The money issue will improve for them, “ Three outfits can run about $130,” said Jan Underwood, owner of the U. Parents have had to struggle with deciding if what there kids are warring is proper. How about on a school field trip would it not be easier to identify your students in a crowd if you did not have to remember what everyone was warring. They use this to say that the school has violated the student’s liberty to control his or her personal appearance ( Paliokos 1996). The main argument against them is the need for students to express their individual selves, this argument is losing ground compared to the benefits of the uniform policy. “Irving joins movement supporting required attire. You might even ask, is it ethical to let my dautauter go to school in an almost see-through and skintight outfit? The students being at a school with a uniform policy would now solve this problem. If the uniform policy was in effect this would not be because the see-through skirt would either be part of the uniform and accepted or not, it would now be an objective decision for the teacher to make, either it is a violation or not.
Approximate Word count =
3630
Approximate Pages =
15 (250 words per page double spaced)
Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.
| CREDIT CARD |
ONLINE CHECK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOIN BY PHONE
|
|
|