Whos to blame media or parents
What has the world come to these days? It often seems like everywhere we look, violence rears its ugly head. We see it in the streets, back alleys, schools, and even at home. In the light of the Littleton, Colorado Columbine High shootings, the debate has grown over how media influences children and adolescents. There are many statistics that undeniably support the theory that media causes violence in young children. The entertainment industry insists that their publications(including TV, magazines, Internet, etc.) are legal, guaranteed under the First Amendment. So, who takes responsibility for the crimes committed by juveniles. Is it the entertainment industry (for displaying conscious violence), the government (for lack of regulation), or the parents (for lack of control?). This paper will explore each in an unbiased view. America, the nation with the highest homicide rate in the developed world, has seen violence soar to epidemic levels over the past several decades. During this time there has been passionate and ongoing debate about whether there is a causal relationship between media violence and aggression in society. Contrary to some claims, the medical, public health, and scientific communities
Given that children are relentless in their imitation of people around them, it is logical to conclude that they would also imitate the actions of the people they see on television and in the movies. A poll done for TV Guide showed that one in four Americans would keep their sets even if offered one million dollars. It can reduce prejudice and increase helping behavior. It causes fear among those who do not understand the impact of media on people's lives. " He also believed that television will essentially turn children into lumps of coal or "hypnotized non-thinkers" who are just after the flashy pictures without any real intake. (Donnerstein, 1993) In fact, the 1982 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) reports, supporting the Surgeon General's landmark 1972 conclusions, stated that, "In magnitude television violence is as strongly correlated with aggressive behavior as any other behavioral variable that has been measured. The media can be used to develop community, to reinforce the values of honesty and integrity, and to educate children to be citizens of the world. Government has tried to intervene recently, but with little luck. The effect is not limited to children who are already disposed to being aggressive and is not restricted to this country. National Institute of Mental Health Television and Behavior:(1982) Ten Years of Scientific Progress and Implications for the Eighties (vol 1) Summary Report Valverde, Eduardo (Feb 1995) "Media the Modern Scapegoat?" UNESCO Courier, P15 (1) "Violence in Television Programming Overall": (1996) University of California, Santa Barbara, National Television Violence Study Scientific Papers Studio City, CA Media scope (1994-1995) TV Guide Poll (1992) . Levine, Madeline, (1996) Viewing Violence. (Valverde, 1995) In a study done in Israel, researchers tested 74 children from farms and 112 school children from the city of Tel Aviv.
Common topics in this essay:
Responsibility Evidence,
Entertainment Industry,
Suggestions Let's,
Eron LD,
Tel Aviv,
Evidence America,
Colorado Columbine,
Health Implications,
Leonard Eron,
TV Guide,
entertainment industry,
television violence,
media violence,
aggressive behavior,
violence children,
television children,
tv guide,
violence television,
institute mental health,
eron 1993,
government tried,
entertainment industry insists,
eron ld 1992,
national institute mental,
|
Acceptance Essays
