Neo Nazis And Free Speech
Neo-Nazi's are entitled to the same First Amendment rights under the Constitution as all other American citizens. Simply because a group expresses beliefs which are unpopular and generally considered to be "wrong" does not mean that the group is no longer entitled to free speech. When people are given true freedom of speech, it should be understood that there are always going to be differences in opinions, and that the opinions held by some people will almost invariably be seen as offensive to at least some other people. If the government were to try and censor everything that anyone felt was offensive, then eventually no one would be able to voice their opinion on anything anymore, and the problem with censoring Neo-Nazis and other extreme racist groups is that it opens the door to just this sort of thing. What's more, no one is being forced to listen to anything that the Neo-Nazi's have to say, so the argument that they are causing people irreparable "mental anguish" is just plain invalid because anyone who doesn't agree with what they have to say can just walk away. The people who think that the Neo-Nazi's should be censored simply because their ideas are hurtful to other people need to grow up an
Also, if a Neo-Nazi rally becomes a riot because of spectators who heckle and harass the Neo-Nazis, then the riot is just as much the fault of the spectators as it is the Neo-Nazis, and if you were to censor the Neo-Nazis because of the riots, then you would also have to censor the people with anti-Neo-Nazi beliefs as well. Also, although the Neo-Nazi philosophy may advocate violence and lead to an increased number of hate crimes, this is not a reason to revoke their First Amendment rights either. Although words can be hurtful at times, if someone says something that people find offensive, then they can just not listen, rather than crying to the government and asking it to hold their hands and protect them from the world. If someone says something which you find offensive, then you are free to tell them that you think they are wrong, and argue your point, or free to walk away. Although other democratic countries have historically censored Neo-Nazi and other racist ideologies and been successful while doing so does not make this action right, nor does it make not censoring wrong. Besides this point, stopping the open public expression of Neo-Nazi ideas will not stop the crimes. Whenever you have a society where free speech is permitted, there are going to be some people who ascribe to some very unpopular beliefs, but these people are still entitled to the same freedoms as everyone else, and for this reason, Neo-Nazis should not have their First Amendment rights revoked. The ideas will continue to exist even if the public expression of them is banned, and because of this, the hate crimes will continue to be an issue, even if Neo-Nazis are denied the right to publicly state their beliefs. Censoring Neo-Nazi ideas would just be another step in the wrong direction, a step away from a society where people are free to think, believe and say whatever they want to, and it's really a sad thing when people aren't even free within the confines of their own minds. The people who say that Neo-Nazis are evil, should be eradicated from our society, and do not deserve the most basic of human rights are really no better than the Neo-Nazis themselves, but what they say has never been called into question, simply because they represent the majority, and their opinion is typically considered to be the correct one. I believe that although most Neo-Nazis are uneducated racists, the truly violent Neo-Nazis make up only a small extremist fringe within the overall group. This is because the crimes are a result of Neo-Nazi ideas, and not a result of the fact that these ideas can be openly expressed. While other countries have censored unpopular beliefs, this does not mean that we should or are obligated to follow in their footsteps, and if we did follow their example, we would be going against the very thing which this country was founded to protect, namely, individual freedom.
Common topics in this essay:
Constitution American,
United America,
Censoring Neo-Nazi,
,
neo-nazi ideas,
Neo-Nazis Amendment,
amendment rights,
Bibliography None,
hate crimes,
words words,
beliefs people,
free speech,
public expression,
unpopular beliefs,
|
Acceptance Essays
