Banning On Cloning Is Unjust
On February 24, 1997, the world was shocked and fascinated by the announcement of Ian Wilmut and his colleagues. A press release stated that they had successfully cloned a sheep from a single cell of an adult sheep. Since then, cloning has become one of the most controversial and widely discussed topics. The issue that gets the greatest focus is human cloning, and there has been an onslaught of protests and people lobbying for a ban on it. However, there is a real danger that prohibitions on cloning will open the door to inappropriate restrictions on accepted medical and genetic practices. Therefore, the banning of cloning is unjust.The most popular objection to human cloning is the assumption that science would be playing God if it were to create human clones. This argument refuses to accept the advantage of biological processes and to view the changes of the world. Religious objections were once raised at the prospects of autopsies, anesthesia, artificial insemination, organ transplants, and other acts that seemed to be tampering with divine will. Yet enormous benefits have been gathered by each of these innovations, and they have become a part of human's daily life. The issue of playing God has already arisen when a doctor
Also, conditions such as Alzheimer disease, diabetes, heart failure, degenerative joint disease, and other problems can be made curable as a result of human cloning. By combining the technology behind embryonic stem cells and cloning, skin for burnt victims, brain cells for the brain damaged and spinal chord cells for quadriplegics and paraplegics can be grown. A baby girl is born free of the gene that causes Tay-Sachs disease, even though both her parents are carriers. The reason? In the embryonic cell from which she was cloned, the flawed gene was replaced with normal DNA. Though cloning research does present some dangers, it also has many potential benefits and should not be banned simply out of fear of its possible misuses. One of the more eloquently stated fears about the loss of uniqueness is a consideration for the rights of the clone to a unique and untried genotype. Richard Seed, one of the leading proponents of human cloning technology suggests that "Cloning can help reverse ageing by teaching us how to set our age back to 20. To bolster his failing eyesight, he receives a transplant of healthy retinal tissue cloned from his own cells and cultivated in a lab dish. This time, using cow egg cells, researchers modified donor cells in such a way that the egg rejuvenated the new cells and gave them traits of youthful cells. Cloning can directly offer a means of curing diseases or often a technique that can extend means to acquiring new data for the sciences of embryology. European researchers reported that they had developed a method using cloning technology that could help many infertile women to have babies; they do this by inserting the nucleus of one woman ¥'s egg into another woman's egg. There have always been religious and moral objections to new technologies and changes merely because they are different and unknown to humans. In Dolly the sheep, scientists found that cloned cells retained the age of the donor. This would allow an older woman to have a baby that is genetically hers, but using the resources of a younger woman's egg. Nothing that is known about human cloning is likely to be used to justify such a step.
Common topics in this essay:
Ian Wilmut,
Richard Seed,
human cloning,
,
ian wilmut,
playing god,
age zero,
successfully cloned sheep,
science playing god,
ian wilmut colleagues,
repair damaged,
clone source,
cloning research,
cloned sheep,
cell adult,
cloning technology,
|
Acceptance Essays
