Nominations to the Supreme Court
When nominating a justice to the Supreme Court the President must take a variety of factors into consideration, the main factor that the President must take into account is the nominee's ideology since it influences how the Senate will react to the confirmation. The Senate is less likely to confirm a justice who is ideologically distant from the majority of senators of from the senator's constituencies. The President must also take into account several other factors, many of which will be discussed in this essay.Research shows that the President takes five majors factors into account when choosing a nominee for the Supreme Court: the ideology of the nominee compared to the President and Senate; the makeup of the Court; the background of the nominee, including race, gender, geographic location, and religion; the qualifications of the nominees; and the political power of the President.A President is more likely to choose a nominee that he feels has ideological similarities to himself. Presidents nominate those who have consistent conservative, if the president is a Republican, or liberal views, if he is a Democrat, in order that the future decisions of the nominee on certain issues may be ascertained beforehand. Simply, a Re
The process is as follows: after a detailed evaluation, justices are nominated by the President and assessed on their chances of being confirmed by the Senate. Clarence was a conservative justice nominated by Bush in 1991 to replace Thurgood Marshall. Many Democrats claimed that his nomination was an attempt by Reagan to pack the court with those who held similar ideologies. If he or she receives two-thirds of the vote, the person is confirmed by the Senate. The confirmation process in the Senate includes a confirmation hearing of the nominee before the Senate Judiciary Committee and then a vote by the entire Senate. Many people believe that the idea of Supreme Court justices being appointed rather than elected is undemocratic. Therefore, Presidents have been shown to consider religion, gender, race, and other factors, in appointments in order to balance the Court's makeup. It is also a vital component of the checks and balances system of the three branches of government. The confirmation hearing of Clarence Thomas also became national news. Even more recently, in 1981, Sandra Day O'Connor was the first woman appointed. Bork supporters claimed that the protests were an "ideological inquisition". A more popular President may coerce more people into contacting Senators about a nominee that they would like to see appointed and the Senators are representatives that, at least in part, must listen to the people they represent. Thomas denied all of the allegations and described the hearings as a "high-tech lynching. Reagan nominated Robert Bork in 1987, he was strongly qualified for the job but he was also strongly conservative.
Common topics in this essay:
Anita Hill,
Supreme Court,
Court President,
Day O'Connor,
Robert Bork,
Bork Bork,
President President,
Democratic President,
Senate Senate,
John Harlan,
confirmation hearing,
confirmation hearings,
president account,
clarence thomas,
supreme court,
robert bork,
justice shares views,
president choose,
ideological makeup,
confirmation process,
senate confirmation,
ideological makeup senate,
hearings robert bork,
senate confirmation hearing,
bork clarence thomas,
|
Acceptance Essays
