Benefit of increasing drinking age
All Negative Possibilities, No Good OutcomeProposition: Claim of policy. The minimum age for drinking alcohol should remain at the age of 21 in California. "Hey, you want a drink?" "Oh come on, just one drink, it won't hurt you. It's fun." "It's cool. Everybody does it." (Ring ring ring) "Ma'am your daughter is in the hospital caused by an overdose of alcohol. Your daughter is in critical condition; please prepare yourself for the worst." It started by one drink, but later it became many more. Millions of parents every year receive the same fatal phone call; in fact, according to the website of Drinking and Driving Data, every 30 minutes someone in the U.S dies in an alcohol-related crash. Drunk driving remains a serious national problem that tragically affects thousands of victims annually. Reducing the age for minorities to drink alcohol under 21 will increase motor-vehicle crashes, death, injury, homicides, suicides, taxation, and brain damage. With all these negative outcomes, it is crucial to enforce legal drinking alcohol age at 21 years old. We must not reduce the age limit. The website of Youth Facts on Alcohol and Other Drugs announced, " Drivers at the ages 21-24 had the highest intoxication rates at 27% for
As said by website of Promoting Awareness of Alcohol Issues, "Alcohol steady usage consumed in the brain while intoxicated by alcohol causes the brain to reduce the amount of brain tissue and lead to mental disturbance. Teenagers are relatively inexperienced consumers of alcohol and have a false sense of invincibility and immorality; therefore allowing them to drink alcohol at such a young age will leave them vulnerable to drunk driving. With only one drink, a driver is 50% more likely to become involved in a car crash. Many other parts of the human body are affected by alcohol including the heart. Limiting the age in which people cannot drink until they are 21 would protect and benefit everyone. Alcohol not only affect a person's mind to concentrate properly on schoolwork, it also causes them to endanger themselves and others in school property. Alcohol may relieve a person at that moment, but it affects them more than it relieves them. What they don't need is another factor to damage their body!Everyday children and schools are suffering with schoolwork and injuries, especially those in college. If they are allowed to drink at a young age of 21, they will not have a reason not to drink a lot. " Education is one of the most important aspects in life, and California believe to enforce it too. According to National Council on Alcohol and Drug Dependence, "given major underreporting of alcohol-related diagnoses, minimum estimates from one survey of non-Federal, short-stay hospitals in 1991 found 54. They may go to a party and have one drink, but one leads to two, and two leads to many more. Allowing minors to drink alcohol under the age of 21 will cause minor's death rate, suicide, homicide, injury, rape, and death dramatically increase. If California is willing to do whatever it takes to increase education and its impact, why harm the children's education by reducing alcohol age?Reducing the alcohol age will not only harm teenagers, it will harm people throughout California.
Common topics in this essay:
Drug Dependence,
Issues Alcohol,
Alcohol Drugs,
DT Levy,
Drinking Data,
Driving Data,
Youth Alcohol,
Drug Testing,
California Hey,
Drugs Statistics,
alcohol age,
alcohol drugs,
youth alcohol drugs,
youth alcohol,
drink alcohol,
college students,
reducing alcohol,
age 21,
teenagers drink,
juvenile institutions,
homicides suicides,
reducing alcohol age,
awareness alcohol issues,
promoting awareness alcohol,
alcohol age 21,
|
Acceptance Essays
