The Treaties following WWI and its effects
The restless state in Europe after World War I can be attributed to the poorly established peace treaties. The peace treaties of 1919 through the 1920's developed common ideas in order to prevent a future war and settle disputes. Agreements to disarm amongst nations provided a sense of security, especially after the Treaty of Versailles. However, the idealistic notions of the peace treaties proved unsuccessful, as none of the nations wanted to disarm first. Many treaties that followed the First World War were also created in order to make sure the stronger powers would not dominate. Because large amounts of damages were done, especially on the French territory, harsh reparations for Germany seemed reasonable as peacemakers and politicians saw this as restoring the 'balance of power'. Although the attempts to make peace were evident, the ideals of the peace treaties enabled more problems to arise and eventually led to the Second World War. The first step to establishing peace was to disarm, and limit the size of militaries. Clemenceau believed that the Treaty of Versailles of 1919 was created in order to 'save Germany from aggression'. The treaty wanted Germany to limit her army to 100,000 men, along with other burdening reparati
As peacemakers discussed the treaties, its terms were not properly revised as a lot of different groups were involved. But the treaty only angered the public and gave the Germans motivation to arise from it. The Washington Naval Treaty agreed upon limiting the size of Japan's navy, with a 3:5:5 ratio in favor of the British and Americans. The Treaty of Sevres resulted in the division of the Ottoman Empire between the French and British. Because Europe was in an unstable state after the First World War, this permitted the unrealistic demands of the peace treaties. Growing tensions in the Pacific made USA weary about Japanese interest in the East. And the Dawes and Young plan, which followed the Treaty of Locarno, eased German reparations to a quarter of the original total. By forcing Germany to disarm, Clemenceau believed that there was room for restoration of peace in Europe. Although the Treaty of Versailles and The Washington Naval Treaty had efforts for peace, the reluctance of the nations to accept disarmament only gave room for future suspicion and mistrust. The Dawes and Young Plan only proved that enforcement of the Treaty of Versailles was inconsistent, and weakened the economy of Europe. The terms of the peace treaties from 1919 to 1929 were to create peace, but it unintentionally gave birth to long-term problems, which were involved in key events that eventually led to World War II. This then became Hitler's motivation to break ties with the treaty. The treaties' ideals were a step to peace, however, nations felt reluctant to disarm as a number of military weapons and technologies have been produced for the First World War. The Treaty of Versailles demanded 6.
Common topics in this essay:
World War,
Treaty Versailles,
Angered Turks,
Versailles Allies,
Contrary Clemenceau's,
Naval Treaty,
War Germany,
British Americans,
Locarno USA,
world war,
Europe Allies,
peace treaties,
treaty versailles,
treaties world war,
treaty versailles demanded,
treaties world,
limit army,
war germany,
clemenceau believed,
germany limit army,
amongst nations,
nations reluctant disarm,
disarm military,
65 gold marcs,
reluctant disarm,
|
Acceptance Essays
