Subjects:
Prior to the birth of Oedipus, a prophecy was spoken over Laius and his wife Jocasta. They were told that their son would one day be his father’s killer and would then marry his mother. In fear, King Laius and Queen Jocasta sent the baby Oedipus off with a slave to be killed. He was never killed, but rather was given to a childless king and queen which lovingly raised him. Oedipus was never
. . .
As the tragedy comes to a close, the truth is revealed to Oedipus concerning his lineage and unnatural actions. According to the norms of modern Criminal Justice, an individual cannot be guilty of a crime that he did not understandably commit; he cannot be guilty of a crime unless there is evidence of mens rea. Upon confrontation, Oedipus killed all but one of the men in self defense. Neither can he be guilty of defiling Laius’s marriage bed, as he did not know that Jocasta was the wife of the man he had murdered. Oedipus and his wife-mother ruled together and had four children while never knowing of the true relationship between each other. One might say that Oedipus is then guilty of murder regardless, but if he had killed in self defense, that cannot be true. Oedipus cannot be guilty of lying to the people of the city of Thebes since he did not know he was not speaking the truth.
Unfortunately, Oedipus was the victim of destiny. He had no understanding of Laius as his birth father upon killing him.
While still traveling, Oedipus had come to the city of Thebes. The gods caused him to fall prey to fate and injustice. Although the truth had been spoken to him about these matters previously, Oedipus had chosen not to believe and understandably so.
Since Oedipus had no knowledge of his birth parents, he cannot be accused of knowingly fulfilling the prophecy. Unknowingly, Oedipus had begun to fulfill the prophecy for one of the men had been his birth father, Laius.
Essay's Topics
All research is for reference purposes only.