18011817
Between 1801 and 1817 the two parties in the national government of the United States traded sides on the issue of loose construction vs. strict construction of the Constitution because they had also traded sides of the power table. The Democratic-Republicans having gained power seemed to have abandoned their strict constructionist beliefs and adopted a broader perspective. The Federalists having lost power seemed to have dropped the loose construction and adopted strict interpretation. These years show people that political parties sometimes change their values in order to serve their own needs. John Randolph sees the situation unfolding right before his eyes, but his speech apparently has no effect on the House (F). Randolph, a Democratic-Republican, believes that the Tariff of 1816 will harm the major
broad constructionists according to their position of power. The political parties of 1801-1817 definitely broke their traditional mold of strict vs. Once again, the parties seemed to have traded their values in accordance with their status. In 1814 the Federalists went so far as to hold the Hartford Convention (E) to try to eliminate the Embargo Act. for the benefit of a few factory owners. In 1800 before becoming president, Jefferson wrote to Granger (A) that he still believed in strict interpretation of the Constitution. He states that even though the government has the power to regulate interstate commerce, it does not have the power to regulate it by creating roads or canals (H). Federalists believed that according to the Constitution the federal government had the right to regulate only interstate commerce. Due to this unpredictable behavior and the similarities to a corrupt government this time period must have been very confusing and frightening for the common citizen . The Internal Improvements Bill would allow the United States government to use funds collected from taxes on stocks to build roads and canals for commerce, but Madison vetoed the bill based on a strict interpretation of the Constitution. When the Embargo Act was passed in 1814, Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution while the Federalists used a strict interpretation. As a Democratic-Republican, Randolph stuck to his beliefs that the welfare of the majority is more important and opposes the tariff, but the rest of the Democratic-Republican House was power hungry and approved the tariff. Once again, a Democratic-Republican in power puts the party's original values aside and makes a decision using a strict interpretation.
Common topics in this essay:
Improvements Bill,
,
Constitution Constitution,
Constitution Federalists,
Similarly Federalists,
Democratic-Republican House,
Embargo Act,
Randolph Democratic-Republican,
Democratic-Republican Randolph,
Jefferson Madison,
strict interpretation,
interpretation constitution,
loose interpretation constitution,
strict interpretation constitution,
loose interpretation,
strict construction,
instead typical,
political parties,
interstate commerce,
loose construction,
regulate interstate commerce,
constitution instead typical,
interpretations constitution,
power regulate,
interpretations constitution instead,
|
Acceptance Essays
