Feedback Form
Quality
Research
Material!

Social Darwinism

In his most famous book On the Origin of Species, Darwin included four major arguments: that new species appear; that these new species have evolved from older species; that the evolution of species is the result of natural selection; and "that natural selection depends upon variations and the maintenance of variation in spite of the tendency of natural selection to eliminate 'unfit' variants" (403). After Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859, Herbert Spencer(1820-1903) took hold of Darwin's theory of natural selection and applied it to society as well as evolution. He strayed from biology to society. Spencer's ideas became known as Social Darwinism. The theory of natural selection holds that only the most well-adapted individuals in a population will survive and reproduce. These successful individuals pass on their adaptive advantage to their offspring. Over many generations, the process ensures the adaptation of the entire population to its environment. This holds true in the jungle, but it was Spencer who coined the phrase "survival of the fittest" to describe the competition among human individuals and groups. He argued that human progress resulted from the triumph of more advanced individuals and cult

. . .

Also a Social Darwinist he believed that "The millionaires are a product of natural selection. These people wanted an economic market that was free from outside regulation. Similarly, the stronger and more successful businessman weeds out his unskilled competitors. "Survival of the fittest" is still a theory that drives many a man to succeed and strive for greatness. There were no rights against a nature which sanctions ruthless competition. It brought the men who were already in power into greater control, but kept the lower classes and minorities at a stand still. If nature had an iron law, then justice, equality, and natural rights were fiction. These concepts and laws that Social Darwinism entails were obviously more widely accepted by the upper classes and business men who would benefit most by this organization of natural selection. If there was a "natural order" to nature which, if left alone, would progress to the survival of the fittest, then any tampering with that order would strike against natue and weaken society. As social Darwinism supports "survival of the fittest," it is only through this that we can see what influence it had on societies progress. Along the lines of Darwinistict thought, a species must evolve to adapt to his surroundings. A friend of Darwin once wrote him, saying:

Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilized so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turks hollow in the struggle for existence. They contended that the system itself, like nature, had inherent systems of checks and balances. Although now is not a period known as Socialy Darwinistic, it can be found in the modern day class system.

Approximate Word count = 1545
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.

CREDIT CARD
ONLINE CHECK
JOIN BY PHONE
Members get exclusive access to over 100,000 essays.
Don't pay per page, get instant access to the whole database.

Essay's Topics

All research is for reference purposes only.

Copyright (c) 2001-2008 Mega Essays LLC, All rights reserved. DMCA