Since the beginning of history, human life has been afflicted with compromises. It is an agreement of differences in which each side makes mutual concessions and strive towards settlement. The contributors of an argument may not always attain a final compromise. This is because one side of the controversy is generally right while the opposing side is generally wrong. When both participants reach a path towards agreement, neither side is truly satisfied; however, both occupants find it reasonable. Consequently, the act of reconciliation ultimately depends on the interests of all individuals involved in the dispute. Compromise may not always appear comfortable, it is, however, the most efficient, workable route towards settling disagreements and maintaining peace between conflicting persons; hence, the inability to compromise produces undesirable and upsetting results. This inability is strongly established in political affairs, human relations, and personal experiences.
             Negotiation is considered one of the most important political virtues. The concept of concession, however, is sometimes absent in several political decisions and therefore, leading to war and chaos. A prime example is the Second World War. The causes of this war were predominantly nationalism, militarism, territorial issues, and most importantly, the Treaty of Versailles, which was embedded on Germany as disciplinary action for the ignition of World War I. Therefore, the prevention of World War II is often debated. Various individuals may argue that pacifying with Nazi Germany would not have stopped the war. Alternatively, the limitation of its immorality and destructiveness was probable. Reconciling with the Axis Powers – Italy and Japan – and the invaded territories was an achievable tactic. For instance, the invasion of France in 1940, by Nazi Germany, instigated France to sign a surrender agreement. Vichy France became the French state of 1940-1944, wh...