euthanasia5
Euthanasia, it is one of the most controversial issues of our time. This controversial issue raises many questions such as: how should decisions be made, and by whom? What should be determined as a matter of law and what left a matter of discretion and judgment? Should those who want to die, or who are in a "persistent vegetative state" be allowed to die voluntarily? Who should decide: the patient, the physician, the courts, or the families? The pro-euthanasia arguments turn on the individual case of the patient in pain, suffering at the center of an intolerable existence. When life becomes unbearable, quick death can be the answer. If living persons become so ill that they cannot tolerate the pain they have a "right to die" to an escape from torment, some may say. So long as the right to die means not prolonging the life by undesirable treatment, it may be classified as rational suicide. The term "euthanasia" means "good health" or "well dying"; it is derived from the Greek "eu" and "thanatos". In its classical sense, it is a descriptive term referring to an easy death as opposed to an agonizing or tormented dying. In Greek literature, euthanasia conveyed a "happy death, an ideal and coveted end to a full and pleasant life
People also believe that patients' wishes should be respected, but that seems not always best for the patients. " This issue raised concerns to doctors. It is strongly believed that physicians can play a positive role in the active euthanasia of mentally competent, terminally ill people who request assistance in ending their own lives. It is crucial that physicians who choose to help dying patients in this way should be "free to do so without the fear of criminal prosecution. All people die, but apparently only people know they are to die. They have their responsibilities, but should they support the patient's position, or should they stay out of it? Should they side with the family? These are very hard questions for them to face. The question goes beyond simply withdrawing treatments. " Most doctors found themselves spending more time than ever before dealing with decisions they were never trained to make decisions at the edge of life. They could avoid those decisions if they could, but there are too many pressures to allow them that comfortable escape. " There is still a question involved in the contemporary debates about euthanasia which is posed by a case such as the terminally ill who are dying. It is expected of doctors to be a strong champions of life, but people fear their capacity to impose continue life. " There are those who will say that active euthanasia is not part of the physician's role and never has been.
Common topics in this essay:
,
Supreme Court,
Grecian Roman,
people believe,
Cardinal Joh,
active euthanasia,
life sustaining treatment,
terminally ill,
patient's life,
life people,
life sustaining,
people die,
sustaining treatment,
|
Acceptance Essays
